2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2004.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kink incorporation and step propagation in a non-Kossel model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(9), because both frequencies w À1 and w À2 are positive and thus positive also have to be the g-term in Eq. (9). This discrepancy may hardly be ascribed to the $ 15% experimental error.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(9), because both frequencies w À1 and w À2 are positive and thus positive also have to be the g-term in Eq. (9). This discrepancy may hardly be ascribed to the $ 15% experimental error.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Each dependence may, indeed, be approximated by a straight line expected from Eq. (9). Making use of this linearity, we may roughly estimate the frequency factor, f, defined by Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Refs. [9] and [7] discuss the non-Kossel (0 0 1) surface in detail. Both papers show that the [1 0 0] step has a step energy of 1 0 0 ¼ 2f a and the [0 1 0] step an energy of 0 1 0 ¼ f p À f q .…”
Section: The Non-kossel Structurementioning
confidence: 99%