2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.09.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

KIR Genotyping Data of More Than 3 Million Individuals Are Available for Global Unrelated Stem Cell Donor Searches (Comment to: Weisdorf D, Cooley S, Wang T, et al. KIR donor selection: feasibility in identifying better donors. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018; doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.08.022.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a joined study, several groups combined their expertise for the in-depth characterization of a cohort of 512 samples (49). However, only the application of NGS enabled the comprehensive characterization of the complete KIR family of genes at allelic level in one assay (29). In contrast to our approach which is based on PCR for target selection, the study by Norman et al (31)relies on capture technology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a joined study, several groups combined their expertise for the in-depth characterization of a cohort of 512 samples (49). However, only the application of NGS enabled the comprehensive characterization of the complete KIR family of genes at allelic level in one assay (29). In contrast to our approach which is based on PCR for target selection, the study by Norman et al (31)relies on capture technology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the fact that KIR and HLA genes reside on different chromosomes, unrelated donors and recipients who are HLA -matched rarely share identical KIR genes. Genotyping the KIR genes of potential stem cell donors at high resolution upon registration and providing this information in addition to the HLA genotypes would thus be beneficial for optimizing the unrelated donor selection process (28, 29).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, we extended the method to limit haplotype structure to pre-established patterns in order to make it applicable to our data obtained by high-throughput KIR genotyping in the context of unrelated HSCT donor registration (53,54). We applied a three-step approach to estimate population-specific KIR haplotype frequencies at allele group resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Massive cost reductions resulting from next‐generation sequencing (NGS)‐based HLA typing (Schmidt et al, ) enabled a substantial extension of the DKMS standard typing profile of new donors beyond HLA. This standard typing profile currently includes the following parameters beyond the six “classical” HLA loci (A, B, C, DRB1, DQB1, DPB1): ABO and Rh blood groups (Lang et al, ), Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Immunoglobulin G (IgG) serostatus (Behrens et al, ; full publication submitted), 16 KIR genes (Schmidt, Lange, Hofmann, Schetelig, & Pingel, ; Wagner et al, ), MICA/MICB (publication submitted), HLA‐E (Hofmann et al, ; full publication in preparation), HLA‐DRB3/4/5, HLA‐DQA1, and HLA‐DPA1 (since October 2019) and the C‐C motif chemokine receptor 5 Delta32 (CCR5∆32) deletion (Solloch et al, ). …”
Section: Donor Typing: Beyond the Classical Hla Locimentioning
confidence: 99%