2009
DOI: 10.9775/kvfd.2011.4704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kızgınlıkları Gözlenemeyen Sütçü İnek ve Düvelerde, Ovsynch, Ovysnch - Progestin, Ovsynch - Progestin - Çift Sun’i Tohumlama Uygulamalarının Gebelik Oranları Üzerine Etkileri

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the sensitivity analysis, there were not any discrepancies neither in the differences between treatments nor in the hierarchy of treatments. Also another sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding those studies, or subgroups within studies, which are conducted with heifers and we did not observe any notable difference in results (King and Robertson, 1974;Stevenson et al, 2000Stevenson et al, , 2008Iwakuma et al, 2008;Karakas et al, 2009;Nak et al, 2009;Gordon et al, 2010). In another sensitivity analysis that we performed excluding the studies published in Turkish journals in Turkish language, we did not encounter any different results compared to the primary model (Aksu, 2010;Bülbül and Ataman, 2005;Kaçar, 2008).…”
Section: Synthesis Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In the sensitivity analysis, there were not any discrepancies neither in the differences between treatments nor in the hierarchy of treatments. Also another sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding those studies, or subgroups within studies, which are conducted with heifers and we did not observe any notable difference in results (King and Robertson, 1974;Stevenson et al, 2000Stevenson et al, , 2008Iwakuma et al, 2008;Karakas et al, 2009;Nak et al, 2009;Gordon et al, 2010). In another sensitivity analysis that we performed excluding the studies published in Turkish journals in Turkish language, we did not encounter any different results compared to the primary model (Aksu, 2010;Bülbül and Ataman, 2005;Kaçar, 2008).…”
Section: Synthesis Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%