Untitled

Abstract

The objective of the consistent-amplitude approach to quantum theory has been to justify the mathematical formalism on the basis of three main assumptions: the first defines the subject matter, the second introduces amplitudes as the tools for quantitative reasoning, and the third is an interpretative rule that provides the link to the prediction of experimental outcomes. In this work we introduce a natural and compelling fourth assumption: if there is no reason to prefer one region of the configuration space over another then they should be 'weighted' equally. This is the last ingredient necessary to introduce a unique inner product in the linear space of wave functions. Thus, a form of the principle of insufficient reason is implicit in the Hilbert inner product. Armed with the inner product we obtain two results. First, we elaborate on an earlier proof of the Born probability rule. The implicit appeal to insufficient reason shows that quantum probabilities are not more objective than classical probabilities. Previously we had argued that the consistent manipulation of amplitudes leads to a linear time evolution; our second result is that time evolution must also be unitary. The argument is straightforward and hinges on the conservation of entropy. The only subtlety consists of defining the correct entropy; it is the array entropy, not von Neumann's. After unitary evolution has been established we proceed to introduce the useful notion of observables and we explore how von Neumann's entropy can be linked to Shannon's information theory. Finally, we discuss how various connections among the postulates of quantum theory are made explicit within this approach.

On the origin of the quantum rules for identical particles

“…We would like to thank John Skilling for a very thorough review of our draft, and Ariel Caticha for insightful discussions, and for suggesting his own operational work [4].…”

Entropic dynamics and the quantum measurement problem

“…See [12] and [14]. For simplicity, we will initially consider a measurement that leads to a discrete set of possible position outcomes.…”

On quantum vs. classical probability

“…In the quantum case these are supplemented by additional coherence conditions [68]. There is also an alternative approach that applies Cox-style consistency requirements to amplitudes rather than probabilities [69,70].…”