1993
DOI: 10.2307/30149729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection on a Rehabilitation Unit: Comparison of Epidemiologic Typing Methods

Abstract: K pneumoniae was acquired frequently by spinal cord-injured patients with extended admissions, re-emphasizing the importance of both patients and staff following appropriate infection control practices on rehabilitation wards. Ribotyping was the optimal method for typing K pneumoniae isolates.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Amikacin and gentamicin are not commonly used antibiotics because of their potential nephrotoxicity, which might be a cause for this result. Previous studies have focused on the antibiotic resistance of P. aeruginosa (15)(16)(17)(18)(19) or K. pneumoniae in patients with SCI (16,(19)(20)(21)(22). Although Klebsiella was the second most common uropathogen seen in our SCI patients, its distribution was not significantly different between acute and chronic patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Amikacin and gentamicin are not commonly used antibiotics because of their potential nephrotoxicity, which might be a cause for this result. Previous studies have focused on the antibiotic resistance of P. aeruginosa (15)(16)(17)(18)(19) or K. pneumoniae in patients with SCI (16,(19)(20)(21)(22). Although Klebsiella was the second most common uropathogen seen in our SCI patients, its distribution was not significantly different between acute and chronic patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In epidemiological investigations, we therefore advocate two primers routinely for RAPD typing with perhaps a reserve primer for equivocal results. With two primers we achieved 100% typability, a rate unmatched by capsular serotyping, bacteriocin and bateriophage typing of K. pneumoniae [4][5][6]. There are two possible reasons why RAPD with HI-RP primer indicated M3 to be distinct from MI, M4 and M6 whereas all four isolates had identical CHEF profiles and RAPD profiles with Ut primer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biotyping and antibiogram typing are too limited in their ability to discriminate between strains to be used for the epidemiological typing of K. pneumoniae [2,4]. Whereas capsular serotyping, phage typing and bacteriocin typing have more discriminatory power, all three are time consuming and expensive methods and not all strains of K. pneumoniae are successfully typed by these methods [2,[4][5][6]. At present the most discriminatory method of typing K. pneumoniae involves the use of restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) techniques [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Table II). The first report was published in 1993 and did not appear to involve an ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae clone [16]. Nine reports described outbreak clones that produced various ESBLs or carbapenemases including SHV-4 [17], SHV-2 [8], an unidentified ESBL [2], the AmpC beta-lactamase ACC-1 [18], KPC-2 carbapenemase and SHV-5 [19], NDM carbapenemase [20], NDM-1 carbapenemase, CTX-M-15 and OXA-1 [21], KPC carbapenemases [22], and CTX-M-15 and OXA-1 [23].…”
Section: Outbreak Evolution and Infection Controlmentioning
confidence: 95%