2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41556-019-0390-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

KLF4 is involved in the organization and regulation of pluripotency-associated three-dimensional enhancer networks

Abstract: Cell fate transitions are accompanied by global transcriptional, epigenetic and topological changes driven by transcription factors (TFs), as is exemplified by reprogramming somatic cells to pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) via expression of OCT4, KLF4, SOX2 and cMYC. How TFs orchestrate the complex molecular changes around their target gene loci remains incompletely understood. Here, using KLF4 as a paradigm, we provide a TF-centric view of chromatin reorganization and its association to 3D enhancer rewiring and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
134
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(91 reference statements)
10
134
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results identify a functional overlap between two members of the same family of orphan nuclear receptors, Esrrb and Nr5a2, in supporting pluripotency in ESCs. Similar redundant functions have been described for another family of auxiliary pluripotency TFs, KLFs (Di Giammartino et al, 2019;Yamane et al, 2018). The individual deletion of Klf4, Klf2 and Klf5 is compatible with self-renewal in ESCs, but not the concomitant loss of all three TFs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Our results identify a functional overlap between two members of the same family of orphan nuclear receptors, Esrrb and Nr5a2, in supporting pluripotency in ESCs. Similar redundant functions have been described for another family of auxiliary pluripotency TFs, KLFs (Di Giammartino et al, 2019;Yamane et al, 2018). The individual deletion of Klf4, Klf2 and Klf5 is compatible with self-renewal in ESCs, but not the concomitant loss of all three TFs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…While the global transcriptional resetting patterns and the respective GO terms of both eTREs and genes were highly concordant, this does not allow drawing firm conclusions on the relative reactivation of enhancers and their target genes. To address this, we assigned eTREs to their most proximal gene based on linear distance (<20kb) ( Figure 3E), and to one or more distal target genes (>20kb) ( Figure 3F) based on long-range chromatin contacts detected by H3K27ac HiChIP analysis in asynchronous PSCs (Di Giammartino et al, 2019). Both approaches showed coordinated activation of eTREs and their target genes at frequencies significantly higher than expected by chance ( Figures 3E and 3F).…”
Section: Enhancer Reactivation Patterns Mirror the Kinetics Of Proximmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Not significant (q>0.001) terms are shown in gray. enriches for structural over regulatory loops (Bonev et al, 2017;Di Giammartino et al, 2019;Mumbach et al, 2016), and does not cover a large fraction (~50%) of expressed genes and eTREs. Therefore, we decided to revisit this question by performing high-resolution 4C-seq around the promoters of 11 example genes with distinct reactivation patterns and biological relevance (Table S5).…”
Section: Different Patterns Of Chromatin Loops Characterize Early or mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations