2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3300411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

KLF8 is Associated with Poor Prognosis and Regulates Glycolysis by Targeting GLUT4 in Gastric Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SLC2A4 is an e cient glucose transporter, which is located in the cytoplasmic vesicles and can be transferred to the plasma membrane to take up glucose when stimulated by insulin [21] . It has been shown that SLC2A4 was elevated in cancer progression [22,23] , which is in conformity with our results. SLC2A4 inhibition abolished the biological effects of PC cells in proliferation, migration and invasion induced by miR-302b-3p downregulation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…SLC2A4 is an e cient glucose transporter, which is located in the cytoplasmic vesicles and can be transferred to the plasma membrane to take up glucose when stimulated by insulin [21] . It has been shown that SLC2A4 was elevated in cancer progression [22,23] , which is in conformity with our results. SLC2A4 inhibition abolished the biological effects of PC cells in proliferation, migration and invasion induced by miR-302b-3p downregulation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The c-index and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of different time were used to compare the discriminative ability of the nomogram and AJCC 7th system (IVA/IVB) in the training and validation groups. Calibration curves were created to assess the predictive accuracy in the two groups [21] .Then, we calculated the risk score of each training group patient according to the Cox regression model. The X-title program (versions 3.6.1) was used to select the optimal cut-off for the risk score to distinguish the differences in patient survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we calculated the risk score of each training group patient according to the Cox regression model. The X-title program (versions 3.6.1) was used to select the optimal cutoff for the risk score to distinguish the differences in patient survival [20,21] . Then, the training and validationg group patients were divided into high and low risk groups according to risk score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%