2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00103-009-0825-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Klinische Studien außerhalb des Arzneimittelgesetzes

Abstract: The evaluation of diagnostic tests (DT) or procedures is not subject to uniform regulations. However, a thorough evaluation of DT which are intended for use in routine medical practice is advisable or even indispensible for economic, medical, and ethical reasons. This article addresses some important aspects of this evaluation: the facets of "evaluating a DT", common validity measures for qualitative and quantitative DT, the applicability and generalizability of estimates of diagnostic accuracy, objectives and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, we can distinguish four phases for diagnostic and prognostic biomarker studies (q Table 2) [1,[8][9][10][11][12]. Phase I comprises preliminary technical and methodological studies.…”
Section: Levels Of Evidence and Phases Of Diagnostic Studies ▼mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, we can distinguish four phases for diagnostic and prognostic biomarker studies (q Table 2) [1,[8][9][10][11][12]. Phase I comprises preliminary technical and methodological studies.…”
Section: Levels Of Evidence and Phases Of Diagnostic Studies ▼mentioning
confidence: 99%