2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-017-1941-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knee Implant Loosening Detection: A Vibration Analysis Investigation

Abstract: Knee implant loosening is mainly caused by the weakness of the prosthesis-bone interface and is the main reason for surgical revisions. However, pre-operative diagnosis is difficult due to lack of accurate tests. In this study, we developed a vibration-based system to detect the loosening of the tibial implant of an instrumented knee prosthesis. The proposed system includes an instrumented vibrator for transcutaneous stimulation of the bone in a repeatable manner, and accelerometer sensors integrated into the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most sensitive band was found to be above 1500 Hz. (T1-C5) Arami et al [50] also provided a technology to detect loosening states of tibial knee implants.…”
Section: Monitoring Methods and Technologies For Cemented Fixationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most sensitive band was found to be above 1500 Hz. (T1-C5) Arami et al [50] also provided a technology to detect loosening states of tibial knee implants.…”
Section: Monitoring Methods and Technologies For Cemented Fixationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loose implant (in red) can be characterized (by comparison with the fixed, in blue) by an increase in the resonance frequency and by the appearance of harmonics in the output signal. Adapted from the work in[50] under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…every 6 or 12 months). However, detection of early stages of loosening are ambiguous and can be subjective due to low specificity and accuracy [13,14]. This limits the use of X-ray techniques in detecting early loosening, although it is considered the gold standard in confirming implant loosening.…”
Section: A Current Diagnostic Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, non-imaging techniques in the framework of vibrational analysis of the bone-prosthesis system (also known as vibrometry, modal analysis, etc.) have been developed for intraoperative fixation evaluation [5], [7], [11], [15]- [19], osseointegration assessment [20]- [23], and postoperative loosening diagnosis [24]- [32]. Development of instrumented (sensorintegrated) prostheses [22], [27], [28], [33], [34] with telemetric systems for in vivo monitoring [35], [36], establishment of new techniques based on acoustics [23], [34], use of ultrasound probes instead of conventional sensors like accelerometers [30], and extracorporeal shockwave excitation [31] are amongst the recent efforts towards the vibrational analysis of the boneprosthesis systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of previous studies the bone-prosthesis system was excited over a narrow frequency band (e.g., <1 kHz [25], [26], 0.1-1.2 kHz [24], 0.1-1.5 kHz [30], 1.2-2 kHz [17], [19], 0.1-2 kHz [29], and 0.03-3 kHz [32]). However, the most sensitive band for excitation was found above 4 kHz during the insertion of prosthesis in a THA [11], and between 12 and 15 kHz for the shoulder joint [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%