“…1 The purported aim of a UKA is to provide a restoration of knee function closer to a healthy non-surgical knee, compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) as the procedure requires less soft tissue dissection, and both cruciate ligaments can be preserved. 2,3 Thus, a shorter recovery period, 4 better clinical outcomes, like Knee Society scores, 5,6 comparable knee extensor strength, leg power and stair maneuver times, 7 and similar or better knee kinematics during gait 6,8,9 are expected for UKA as those reported in the literature. Moreover, evidence shows that UKA implants have comparable survivor rates with TKA 1,10-14 and lower revision rates.…”