2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2019.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knock-out mutation of eukaryotic initiation factor 4E2 (eIF4E2) confers resistance to pepper veinal mottle virus in tomato

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 1INS and 3DEL alleles significantly reduced the susceptibility to PVY N but not to PVY O (Figure 2). These results can be interpreted on the basis of previous studies in which eIF4E1 and eIF4E2 were individually or doubly knocked out or down in tomato (Mazier et al, 2011;Gauffier et al, 2016;Bastet et al, 2017;Moury et al, 2020). The previous studies indicated that PVY primarily uses eIF4E1, but most PVY strains can alternatively use eIF4E2 to promote infection when eIF4E1 is knocked out or down.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 1INS and 3DEL alleles significantly reduced the susceptibility to PVY N but not to PVY O (Figure 2). These results can be interpreted on the basis of previous studies in which eIF4E1 and eIF4E2 were individually or doubly knocked out or down in tomato (Mazier et al, 2011;Gauffier et al, 2016;Bastet et al, 2017;Moury et al, 2020). The previous studies indicated that PVY primarily uses eIF4E1, but most PVY strains can alternatively use eIF4E2 to promote infection when eIF4E1 is knocked out or down.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Natural antiviral alleles of eIF4E1 have been identified as pot1 and pot1 2 on chromosome 3 in tomato relatives (Ruffel et al, 2005;Lebaron et al, 2016). A knockout mutant of eIF4E2 on chromosome 2 confers resistance to pepper veinal mottle virus (Piron et al, 2010;Moury et al, 2020). Interestingly, pot1 shows a wider spectrum of resistance to members of the Potyvirus genus than does a knockout mutant of eIF4E1; in addition, it shows a similar spectrum to that of eIF4E1 and eIF4E2 double-knockout, without the growth defect seen in the double-knockout plant (Gauffier et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the loss-of-function of the eIF4E protein, the plant lacks one of its most important interaction partners for bymoviruses (Wang and Krishnaswamy, 2012). That mechanism has been reported to confer broad resistance to several bymoviruses in a number of dicotyledonous plants as, for instance, cucumber, tomato and Arabidopsis (Chandrasekaran et al, 2016;Pyott et al, 2016;Atarashi et al, 2020;Moury et al, 2020). However, in a temperate cereal such as barley, the full knock-out of EIF4E was rather expected to be lethal; Yang et al (2016) screened over 2,900 wild and domesticated barley accessions and identified 65 haplotypes for HvEIF4E, of which 19 were associated with resistance to bymoviruses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recognition of eIF4E as a major susceptibility factor for potyviruses led research groups to develop resistance strategies by targeting this protein factor. eIF4E mediated virus resistance has been shown in tomato (Gauffier et al, 2016;Moury et al, 2020), melon (Rodríguez-Hernández et al, 2012), plum (Wang et al, 2013), peanut (Xu et al, 2017), lettuce (Tavert-Roudet et al, 2012), potato (Cavatorta et al, 2011), peas (Bruun-Rasmussen et al, 2007 and soybean (Gao et al, 2020). Since potyviruses also interact with eIFiso4E, this protein has also been targeted for virus resistance.…”
Section: Eif4e and Virusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural or introduced mutations in eIF4E have conferred viral resistance (Dinkova et al, 2016;Leonard, 2004;Moury et al, 2020;Nicaise et al, 2003;. Mutations on eIF4E were designed based on the recessive resistance observations in the PTE-Ta4E model and natural eIF4E resistance in pea, melon, and lettuce (German-Retana et al, 2008).…”
Section: Wheat Eif4e Mutation Designmentioning
confidence: 99%