2014
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knockdown of platinum‐induced growth differentiation factor 15 abrogates p27‐mediated tumor growth delay in the chemoresistant ovarian cancer model A2780cis

Abstract: Molecular mechanisms underlying the development of resistance to platinum-based treatment in patients with ovarian cancer remain poorly understood. This is mainly due to the lack of appropriate in vivo models allowing the identification of resistance-related factors. In this study, we used human whole-genome microarrays and linear model analysis to identify potential resistance-related genes by comparing the expression profiles of the parental human ovarian cancer model A2780 and its platinum-resistant variant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ovarian cancer cell lines used in our studies had constitutively phosphorylated ERK1/2, but it should be noted that cells resistant to cisplatin had these proteins phosphorylated to a significantly higher degree. Intensified basal activity of various kinases is wildly observed in ovarian cancer cells resistant to chemotherapeutic agents [ 17 , 18 ]. The response of the tested cells to the cisplatin treatment was obviously dependent on three parameters, the drug dose, time of exposure and, most importantly, nature of the cancer cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ovarian cancer cell lines used in our studies had constitutively phosphorylated ERK1/2, but it should be noted that cells resistant to cisplatin had these proteins phosphorylated to a significantly higher degree. Intensified basal activity of various kinases is wildly observed in ovarian cancer cells resistant to chemotherapeutic agents [ 17 , 18 ]. The response of the tested cells to the cisplatin treatment was obviously dependent on three parameters, the drug dose, time of exposure and, most importantly, nature of the cancer cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EGR1 is a transcriptional regulator of growth differentiation factor 15 ( GDF15 ) [ 38 ], which was also upregulated in SKOV3-NV by cisplatin but not in SKOV3-C1 cells. While GDF15 has been linked to platinum resistance in pancreatic cancer [ 39 ] and ovarian cancer [ 40 ], it has also been shown to be a common platinum-responsive gene [ 41 , 42 ], and was identified as a potential serum marker for cisplatin-response of ovarian cancer cells [ 43 ]. Thus, the fact that it is not upregulated by cisplatin in SKOV3-C1 cells is also indicative of their dampened cisplatin resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms underlying the platinum resistance observed in A2780cis have not been fully identified. Upregulation of cell proliferation markers [ 39 ], members of the Akt signalling pathway [ 40 , 41 ], DNA-repair mechanisms [ 26 ] and ATP-dependent processes [ 42 ], and reduction in the copper transporter CTR1, thus preventing platinum accumulation [ 43 ] are among the suggested influences. We compared A2780 and A2780cis at the whole genome level in order to further identify mechanisms by which A2780cis has become resistant to cisplatin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%