2006
DOI: 10.1080/016396290968353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Knocking off a Fat Girl:” an Exploration of Hogging, Male Sexuality, and Neutralizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2009). Bridging this conceptual research divide will build understandings of SH in the context of more general ‘cultural misogyny’ (Gailey and Prohaska 2006, p. 31) which sanctions destructive workplace behaviours and undermines broader equal opportunity in employment goals. Such research could also inform institution‐wide conversations beyond the limits of formal policies, which are necessary to determine how behaviours are defined (legally, ethically, institutionally and personally) in the organization, how it should be addressed, and the implications for ignoring or normalizing it (Wear et al .…”
Section: Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2009). Bridging this conceptual research divide will build understandings of SH in the context of more general ‘cultural misogyny’ (Gailey and Prohaska 2006, p. 31) which sanctions destructive workplace behaviours and undermines broader equal opportunity in employment goals. Such research could also inform institution‐wide conversations beyond the limits of formal policies, which are necessary to determine how behaviours are defined (legally, ethically, institutionally and personally) in the organization, how it should be addressed, and the implications for ignoring or normalizing it (Wear et al .…”
Section: Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because both interviewers were women, the participants may not have shared all of the information they knew about hogging because they did not want to offend us (equally they may have been 'playing up' for the interviewers). Gailey and Prohaska (2006) reported that one interviewee actually contacted the first author following the interview to ask her on a date. When she declined, he became hostile and stated that she and Prohaska were lucky they were in good shape or men would not be talking to them about hogging (p. 47).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, deviant women are viewed as deserving of negative treatment from others. In fact, Gailey and Prohaska (2006) found that denial of the victim, or the notion that there was no victim in the encounter because she deserved the treatment, was a common theme reported by men who participated in hogging. The men believed that these women either welcomed the attention or deserved it because they did not conform to gender-based appearance norms.…”
Section: Sexual Encountersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research on fat sexuality is quite diverse, including work on the exploitation of fat women for sexual purposes (Prohaska andGailey 2010, 2009;Gailey and Prohaska 2006;Goode and Priessler 1983), fat as a shield from sexual behavior among women (Millman 1980;Orbach 1978), and, more recently, fat women's sexuality as vibrant and healthy (Gailey 2012). However, only two empirical studies on feederism have been conducted (Prohaska 2013;Bestard 2009), and neither has used a sexual deviance framework.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%