2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2020.165724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knockout of DNase1l1l abrogates lens denucleation process and causes cataract in zebrafish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, N-cadherin and cell nuclei staining at 3 dpf highlighted lens fibre cell defects in epha2b morphant zebrafish similar to that observed in other zebrafish cataract models, suggesting a conserved role in lens fibre cell development [50,51]. Mutations in epha2 may disrupt the adherens junctions in the developing lens, which interfere with the molecular signalling of the optic cup, resulting in microphthalmia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In the present study, N-cadherin and cell nuclei staining at 3 dpf highlighted lens fibre cell defects in epha2b morphant zebrafish similar to that observed in other zebrafish cataract models, suggesting a conserved role in lens fibre cell development [50,51]. Mutations in epha2 may disrupt the adherens junctions in the developing lens, which interfere with the molecular signalling of the optic cup, resulting in microphthalmia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Very little is known about the role of DNase1L1L which does not show any known functional motif at the C-terminal end. DNase1L1L was reported to be uniquely expressed in zebrafish lens and responsible for nuclear DNA degradation during lens development 55 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very little is known about the role of DNase1L1L which does not show any known functional motif at the C-terminal end. DNase1L1L was reported to be uniquely expressed in zebra sh lens and responsible for nuclear DNA degradation during lens development 52 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%