2016
DOI: 10.1614/ipsm-d-15-00039.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knotweed (Fallopiaspp.) Invasion of North America Utilizes Hybridization, Epigenetics, Seed Dispersal (Unexpectedly), and an Arsenal of Physiological Tactics

Abstract: More than 100 years ago, Japanese knotweed was introduced to North America. Given its vigorous rhizome system and capability to grow from rhizome and stem fragments, it persists and spreads locally, forming monotypic stands. The Japanese knotweed clone originally introduced was a male sterile female clone; thus, early in the invasion, reproduction from seed was not an issue. The implication was that long-distance dispersal was relatively rare. However, recently, widespread hybridization between Japanese knotwe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experiments were performed on a seed bank contained in soil extracted in situ and also on seeds of three important plant species invasive in Europe ( Datura stramonium , Reynoutria × bohemica , and Solidago gigantea ), which are abundant seed‐producers (Weaver & Warwick ; Weber & Jakobs ; Gillies et al ). Information about D. stramonium , R. × bohemica , and S. gigantea ecology and invasion history is available in Appendix S1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The experiments were performed on a seed bank contained in soil extracted in situ and also on seeds of three important plant species invasive in Europe ( Datura stramonium , Reynoutria × bohemica , and Solidago gigantea ), which are abundant seed‐producers (Weaver & Warwick ; Weber & Jakobs ; Gillies et al ). Information about D. stramonium , R. × bohemica , and S. gigantea ecology and invasion history is available in Appendix S1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This seed introduction was intended (1) to test the effect of microwaves directly on three important invasive plant species and (2) to evaluate the percentage of seedlings able to emerge after each treatment, when directly mixed with soil. The three species, noxious in some European countries (Weber ; Weber & Jakobs ; Van Kleunen et al ), were chosen not only because they reproduce by seeds (Saayman ; Weber & Jakobs ; Gillies et al ) but also mostly because their seeds differ in shape and size. Indeed, these characteristics are known as major determinants of seed sensitivity to microwave heating (Bebawi et al ; Brodie et al ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hybrid has similar characteristics as F. japonica , some even more vigorous, but it is also able to reproduce via seeds. These seeds are buoyant, while water increases their germination rate [ Gillies et al ., ]. This means that the distribution of Fallopia hybrids toward downstream areas can expand even more rapidly in riparian areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F. japonica is closely related to two other members of the Fallopia genus, F. sachalinensis and Fallopia x bohemica, which have similar invasive ranges and have similar impacts. Of note, in some parts of its invasive range, Fallopia x bohemica spreads via the production of large numbers of wind-dispersed viable seeds that germinate at rates approaching 100% in some populations (Gillies, Clements & Grenz, 2016). However, in the UK, spread by this means does not currently occur in the UK.…”
Section: Study Species: Fallopia Japonicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On a global scale its reputation as a problematic invasive alien species (IAS) primarily stems from its vigorous growth and impacts on riparian habitats (Child & Wade, 2000) coupled with difficulty of eradication (Bailey, 2013;Jones et al, 2018). Verified impacts include the creation of dense monodominant stands (Gillies, Clements & Grenz, 2016;MDNR, 2012); reductions in ecosystem services in riparian zones, e.g. by impeding access (Environment Agency, 2013;Gerber et al, 2008;Kidd, 2000;Urgenson, 2006); negative effects on native plant and invertebrate assemblages in riparian habitats (Gerber 2008); reductions in species richness (Aguilera et al, 2010;Hejda et al, 2009;Urgenson, 2006) and abundance of native understory herbs, shrubs, and juvenile trees in riparian woodlands (Urgenson, 2006); modifications to nutrient cycles (Urgenson, 2006); and impacts on flood defence through impeding water flow and facilitation of riverbank erosion (Booy, Wade & Roy, 2015; Environment Agency, 2013; Kidd, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%