2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowing in action: Beyond communities of practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
469
1
21

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 618 publications
(499 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
8
469
1
21
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with narrative accounts which suggest that networks can be dynamic and impermanent (Amin & Roberts, 2008;Araujo, 1998), but is not consistent with leading network governance theories (Bouckaert, Peters andVerhoest 2010, Sorenson andTorfing 2007). The latter are either silent on the question of the actors, or assume that negotiations take place over time between actors of networks, implying at least a measure of stability of network membership.…”
Section: Study Aimssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…This is consistent with narrative accounts which suggest that networks can be dynamic and impermanent (Amin & Roberts, 2008;Araujo, 1998), but is not consistent with leading network governance theories (Bouckaert, Peters andVerhoest 2010, Sorenson andTorfing 2007). The latter are either silent on the question of the actors, or assume that negotiations take place over time between actors of networks, implying at least a measure of stability of network membership.…”
Section: Study Aimssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…For instance, some authors [34,1] highlight the connection of virtual communities with the social learning theory and communities of practice developed by Wenger [46], while others are focused on their relation with knowledge sharing [24], knowledge creation [26] and innovation models [45]. Another important block of works are devoted to motivation of people participating in online communities [6], the analysis social interactions [39] and participation mechanisms [38,42,43], and practical applications to successful online communities [44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A CoP can be viewed as a "small" social learning system where systemic relationships are embedded within three kinds of community characteristic (see Figure 1 below; Wenger 1998). These characteristics emerge from the social learning embedded within the interactions and these, in turn, produce a systemic output (the "knowledge in action", Amin and Roberts 2008). The first of these characteristics is joint enterprise, which refers to a common purpose that binds community members together and provides them with (a) unified goal(s) to take action.…”
Section: Design Requirements For a Citizen Participation Process As Amentioning
confidence: 99%