2012
DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2012.727195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowing Waste: Towards an Inhuman Epistemology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
71
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Waste mobility scholars have effectively demonstrated how the different meanings and values that waste engenders articulate with technological opportunity to establish and propel circulation among regulatory and economic value regimes (Clapp, 2002;Brownell, 2011;Grant and Oteng-Ababio, 2012;Crang et al, 2013). MSW in particular is both indeterminate and heterogeneous (Hird, 2012). Waste infrastructure's multiple valences contribute ontological opportunities that serve political purposes (Harvey, 2017;Behrsin, 2019).…”
Section: Expanding Upe's Toolkit: Territorialization and Socioecologimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Waste mobility scholars have effectively demonstrated how the different meanings and values that waste engenders articulate with technological opportunity to establish and propel circulation among regulatory and economic value regimes (Clapp, 2002;Brownell, 2011;Grant and Oteng-Ababio, 2012;Crang et al, 2013). MSW in particular is both indeterminate and heterogeneous (Hird, 2012). Waste infrastructure's multiple valences contribute ontological opportunities that serve political purposes (Harvey, 2017;Behrsin, 2019).…”
Section: Expanding Upe's Toolkit: Territorialization and Socioecologimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waste infrastructure's multiple valences contribute ontological opportunities that serve political purposes (Harvey, 2017;Behrsin, 2019). MSW in particular is both indeterminate and heterogeneous (Hird, 2012). As Gille (2013: 5) argues, its indeterminacy 'can be used to point out the limits of waste management experts' haughty reassurances … but it can also undermine … victims of toxic landfills'.…”
Section: Expanding Upe's Toolkit: Territorialization and Socioecologimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This theoretical perspective connects to ecology‐based approaches by drawing attention to the ways in which material flows termed “waste” are entangled within complex socio‐ecological systems (Lankford ), but stresses how specific characteristics of material flows matter differently to different actors. Like the scholarship emphasizing political and biopolitical dimensions of waste, this perspective also treats waste as relational and constitutive of society and ecology, but it differs in its emphasis on nonhuman agency and also in its treatment of waste materials as indeterminate and not necessarily knowable (Hird ).…”
Section: Geographies Of Wastementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Astrida Neimanis' (2013) work on developing feminist subjectivity by thinking through bodies of water -which we cannot fully know -is also worth mentioning. Myra Hird (2012) has shown what feminist theory has to offer in order to develop an understanding of the epistemological and ethical implications of knowing waste. I also find great inspiration in feminist researchers' attempts to make feminism relevant for ecological concerns as well as making environmental-oriented scholarships aware of what feminist theory has to offer (MacGregor 2009;Macgregor 2013;Oppermann 2013;Åsberg 2013;Neimanis, Åsberg, and Hedrén 2015).…”
Section: Research Context Iii: Feminist Environmental Humanitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%