Knowing what the patient wants: a hospital ethnography studying physician culture in shared decision making in the Netherlands

Abstract

ObjectivesTo study physician culture in relation to shared decision making (SDM) practice.DesignExecution of a hospital ethnography, combined with interviews and a study of clinical guidelines. Ten-week observations by an insider (physician) and an outsider (student medical anthropology) observer. The use of French sociologist Bourdieu’s ’Theory of Practice’ and its description of habitus, field and capital, as a lens for analysing physician culture.SettingThe gynaecological oncology department of a university hospital in the Netherlands. Observations were executed at meetings, as well as individual patient contacts.ParticipantsSix gynaecological oncologists, three registrars and two specialised nurses. Nine of these professionals were also interviewed.Main outcome measuresCommon elements in physician habitus that influence the way SDM is being implemented.ResultsThree main elements of physician habitus were identified. First of all, the ‘emphasis on medical evidence’ in group meetings as well as in patient encounters. Second ’acting as a team’, which confronts the patient with the recommendations of a whole team of professionals. And lastly ‘knowing what the patient wants’, which describes how doctors act on what they think is best for patients instead of checking what patients actually want. Results were viewed in the light of how physicians deal with uncertainty by turning to medical evidence, as well as how the educational system stresses evidence-based medicine. Observations also highlighted the positive attitude doctors actually have towards SDM.ConclusionsCertain features of physician culture hinder the correct implementation of SDM. Medical training and guidelines should put more emphasis on how to elicit patient perspective. Patient preferences should be addressed better in the patient workup, for example by giving them explicit attention first. This eventually could create a physician culture that is more helpful for SDM.

Precision medicine and digital phenotyping: Digital medicine's way from more data to better health

“…Social science shows medicine had always had a more ‘human’ aspect to it than science would claim. Practical knowledge, intuition and nuances in the physician–patient relationship have always been very important not just to how decisions around health and illness have been made, but also to what constitutes the professions in health care (Kim et al, 2018; Spinnewijn et al, 2020). Second, if decisions are taken based on historical data, existing categories might be reified and naturalised (Mau, 2017; Mennicken and Espeland, 2019; Quinn, 2021).…”

“…However, decisions in the field of medicine seem to be far more complex, entail much more information and rely on manifold practices as studies, e.g. in medical anthropology, show (Kim et al, 2018; Spinnewijn et al, 2020).…”

Medical and Nonmedical Information during Multidisciplinary Team Meetings in Cancer Care

“…Robust MDT decisions provide an important basis for shared decision-making, which implies a shift in focus from the healthcare provider to the patient. Access to complete information, consideration of patient needs, recognition of barriers for implementation, and balancing risk and benefits support provision of treatment recommendations that are found appropriate and acceptable by the patient [ 31 ].…”

Fostering Patient Choice Awareness and Presenting Treatment Options Neutrally: A Randomized Trial to Assess the Effect on Perceived Room for Involvement in Decision Making

“…Clinicians may act on what they think is best for patients, rather than explore what patients actually want. 54 Further, clinicians’ attitudes toward shared decision making tend to be largely positive but also coupled with reluctance to share decisional control and a lack of understanding of the concept. 55 , 56 Forcino et al, 55 for example, found that among 272 US-based clinicians involved in family medicine or surgery, up to half reported feeling uncomfortable with decisions that stray away from what they think is clinically most appropriate.…”