2008
DOI: 10.1002/mde.1401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge acquisition and transfer among engineers: effects of network structure

Abstract: This paper examines the association between the structure of formal intra-firm networks and productivity. We focus on two network structure components-department centralization and centrality, within a four department engineering organization. Centrality indicates the number of connections between one department and others within the organization, while centralization captures how much of those connections are concentrated among the workers within the department. Both of these represent specific managerial dec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are then easily shared formally and systematically in the form of data, specifications, manuals, etc. (Boone &Ganeshan, 2008). Essentially, explicit knowledge is knowing about (Connell, Klein, & Powell, 2003).…”
Section: Types Of Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are then easily shared formally and systematically in the form of data, specifications, manuals, etc. (Boone &Ganeshan, 2008). Essentially, explicit knowledge is knowing about (Connell, Klein, & Powell, 2003).…”
Section: Types Of Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the knowledge spillover perspective, knowledge generated by failed firms is expropriated by surviving firms through sources such as employee turnover across firms, interactions with suppliers and customers, publications in the trade literature and patents (Hoetker and Agarwal, 2007;Knott and Posen, 2005;Yang et al, 2010). An organization manages and assembles the knowledge that resides individually and collectively among employees is likely to achieve better performance (Boone and Ganeshan, 2008;Tsai, 2000Tsai, , 2001). Organizational knowledge management requires three essential capabilities: the acquisition of outside knowledge by the organization; processes for retaining and storing the existing knowledge stock; and the internal dissemination of knowledge across units (Adler and Clark, 1991;Darr, Argote and Epple, 1995).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes it becomes implicitly obvious from the domain specific language utilized within the information system in use, from where it may be extracted. But since an important part of knowledge resides within people's minds only, its capture is beneficial for advancing collaboration (Boone & Ganeshan, 2008). Thus, exploiting the existence of a "wisdom of crowds", a collective intelligence being broader than an individual alone, facilitates knowledge growth through linking and sharing (Ankolekar, Krötzsch, Tran, & Vrandecic, 2007).…”
Section: Collaborative User Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%