2009
DOI: 10.1163/ej.9789004177437.i-314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge and Colonialism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…as in Boshoff et al, 2016) and to develop tools to derive historical species distribution from these written historical records. Additionally, these historical sources contain descriptions on the fauna, vegetation, climate and inhabitants of the country (Rookmaaker 1989, Hoffman et al 1995, Nash and Endfield 2002, Huigen 2009, Skead 2009). Thus, the study of sampling bias can be informative across disciplines for data extracted from these sources.…”
Section: Biases In South African Historical Written Records Of Mammalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as in Boshoff et al, 2016) and to develop tools to derive historical species distribution from these written historical records. Additionally, these historical sources contain descriptions on the fauna, vegetation, climate and inhabitants of the country (Rookmaaker 1989, Hoffman et al 1995, Nash and Endfield 2002, Huigen 2009, Skead 2009). Thus, the study of sampling bias can be informative across disciplines for data extracted from these sources.…”
Section: Biases In South African Historical Written Records Of Mammalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 For the first c. 150 years, cf. Huigen (2009). Of the six main humanities disciplines that came into being during the nineteenth century, 'Politics', 'Economics', and 'Sociology' were the most prominent.…”
Section: The Beginnings Of Colonisation In South Africa and The Decolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They saw at least some Africans as having reached the maximum level of advancement possible by a "barbaric" people and considered the Boers as having degenerated to the lowest level of European civilization, particularly in terms of agricultural industriousness. 61 These naturalists promoted an expertly managed environment and disapproved of colonial governments that left farmers to their own devices. Rather than invoking the sedate if patronizing tone used to describe African producers, they sternly admonished wealthy Dutch planters, who ostensibly should have known better, emphasizing in particular their imprudent disregard for the conservation of soil nutrients.…”
Section: Agrarian Ambitions and The Fodder Fixmentioning
confidence: 99%