Rationale: Development of diagnostic tools with improved predictive value for tuberculosis (TB) is a global research priority. Objectives: We evaluated whether implementing higher diagnostic thresholds than currently recommended for QuantiFERON Gold-in-Tube (QFT-GIT), T-SPOT.TB, and the tuberculin skin test (TST) might improve prediction of incident TB. Methods: Follow-up of a UK cohort of 9,610 adult TB contacts and recent migrants was extended by relinkage to national TB surveillance records (median follow-up 4.7 yr). Incidence rates and rate ratios, sensitivities, specificities, and predictive values for incident TB were calculated according to ordinal strata for quantitative results of QFT-GIT, T-SPOT.TB, and TST (with adjustment for prior bacillus Calmette-Guérin [BCG] vaccination). Measurements and Main Results: For all tests, incidence rates and rate ratios increased with the magnitude of the test result (P , 0.0001). Over 3 years' follow-up, there was a modest increase in positive predictive value with the higher thresholds (3.0% for QFT-GIT >0.35 IU/ml vs. 3.6% for >4.00 IU/ml; 3.4% for T-SPOT.TB >5 spots vs. 5.0% for >50 spots; and 3.1% for BCG-adjusted TST >5 mm vs. 4.3% for >15 mm). As thresholds increased, sensitivity to detect incident TB waned for all tests (61.0% for QFT-GIT >0.35 IU/ml vs. 23.2% for >4.00 IU/ml; 65.4% for T-SPOT.TB >5 spots vs. 27.2% for >50 spots; 69.7% for BCG-adjusted TST >5 mm vs. 28.1% for >15 mm). Conclusions: Implementation of higher thresholds for QFT-GIT, T-SPOT.TB, and TST modestly increases positive predictive value for incident TB, but markedly reduces sensitivity. Novel biomarkers or validated multivariable risk algorithms are required to improve prediction of incident TB.