Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
ObjectiveThis cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate parents’ knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) concerning the prevention and treatment of dust mite allergy in children.DesignThis cross-sectional study survey was conducted from September to December 2022 at Shengjing Hospital, Affiliated with China Medical University.ParticipantsA total of 503 parents of children with dust mite allergies participated, with 253 parents having children undergoing desensitisation treatment and 250 parents whose children did not. Selection criteria were carefully defined to include parents directly responsible for caring children with dust mite allergies.Primary and secondary outcome measuresTwo distinct questionnaires were administered to parents, tailored for those with and without children undergoing desensitisation treatment. These questionnaires covered demographic information, allergy diagnosis, treatment details and KAP related to dust mite allergy. Primary outcomes included parents’ scores on KAP regarding dust mite allergy prevention and treatment. Secondary outcomes involved analysing the interaction between these factors using pathway analysis.ResultsParents of children undergoing desensitisation treatment exhibited higher scores for all items of knowledge, attitude and overall practice than those without desensitisation therapy (all p values<0.05). The pathway analyses revealed that in the non-desensitisation group, knowledge directly affected attitude (β=0.22, p<0.001) and attitude directly affected practice (β=0.16, p<0.001), but the knowledge did not affect practice (β=−0.01, 0.06, p<0.001). In the desensitisation group, knowledge directly affected attitude (β=0.13, p=0.028), but the practice was not affected by attitude (β=0.08, p<0.001) or knowledge (β=0.03, 0.12, p<0.001).ConclusionsThe study highlighted differing levels of KAP among parents of children with dust mite allergies. The KAP was influenced by desensitisation therapy status. While attitudes tended to be favourable, practices were suboptimal, particularly among parents whose children did not receive desensitisation treatment. These findings emphasise the importance of targeted educational interventions to enhance parental awareness and practices regarding dust mite allergy management, especially in cases where desensitisation treatment is not pursued. Further research is warranted to explore effective strategies for improving parental engagement and adherence to preventive measures.
ObjectiveThis cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate parents’ knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) concerning the prevention and treatment of dust mite allergy in children.DesignThis cross-sectional study survey was conducted from September to December 2022 at Shengjing Hospital, Affiliated with China Medical University.ParticipantsA total of 503 parents of children with dust mite allergies participated, with 253 parents having children undergoing desensitisation treatment and 250 parents whose children did not. Selection criteria were carefully defined to include parents directly responsible for caring children with dust mite allergies.Primary and secondary outcome measuresTwo distinct questionnaires were administered to parents, tailored for those with and without children undergoing desensitisation treatment. These questionnaires covered demographic information, allergy diagnosis, treatment details and KAP related to dust mite allergy. Primary outcomes included parents’ scores on KAP regarding dust mite allergy prevention and treatment. Secondary outcomes involved analysing the interaction between these factors using pathway analysis.ResultsParents of children undergoing desensitisation treatment exhibited higher scores for all items of knowledge, attitude and overall practice than those without desensitisation therapy (all p values<0.05). The pathway analyses revealed that in the non-desensitisation group, knowledge directly affected attitude (β=0.22, p<0.001) and attitude directly affected practice (β=0.16, p<0.001), but the knowledge did not affect practice (β=−0.01, 0.06, p<0.001). In the desensitisation group, knowledge directly affected attitude (β=0.13, p=0.028), but the practice was not affected by attitude (β=0.08, p<0.001) or knowledge (β=0.03, 0.12, p<0.001).ConclusionsThe study highlighted differing levels of KAP among parents of children with dust mite allergies. The KAP was influenced by desensitisation therapy status. While attitudes tended to be favourable, practices were suboptimal, particularly among parents whose children did not receive desensitisation treatment. These findings emphasise the importance of targeted educational interventions to enhance parental awareness and practices regarding dust mite allergy management, especially in cases where desensitisation treatment is not pursued. Further research is warranted to explore effective strategies for improving parental engagement and adherence to preventive measures.
The prevalence of asthma is increasing rapidly, worldwide, due to changing gene-environment interactions. The rate of rise is more in resource poor nations due to lack of knowledge and non-availability of expertise. Monitoring of lung functions is mandatory for diagnosis and further management of asthmatic patients. Spirometry, the widely available investigation, is the gold standard test used for mapping pulmonary dynamicity. It has got its own limitations in the form of operational difficulties in children, the elderly, and in those with neuromuscular or behavioral issues. In the current era of COVID-19 pandemic, the utility of spirometry has been further restricted to selected cohort only, due to potential risk of viral transmission during the procedure. Oscillometry technique has been used previously, to monitor lung functions, with promising results. Ultrasonic waves of various frequencies accompany the tidal breath of patients and respiratory impedance is calculated by measured pressure and flow signals from exhaled breath. The results are interpreted in the form of resistance, reactance, resonant frequency, and reactance area. Various manufacturers have developed different mechanical models with slight variation in impulse pattern till date. There are certain distinct advantages of oscillometry over spirometry. Being tidal breath-based maneuver, it is more child friendly. People with neuromuscular weakness, cognitive limitations, and the elderly can easily perform it with only minor understanding and effort. Oscillometry is more sensitive than spirometry in detecting peripheral airway diseases. Post-bronchodilator reversibility can be evaluated by comparing with the baseline respiratory characteristics. Their utility in restrictive diseases and vocal cord dysfunction has also been explored. Less aerosol generation during the normal tidal breath is another advantage of oscillometry, over spirometry needing forceful efforts, which makes it more suitable for use in viral pandemic situations for monitoring patients with both asthma and pneumonia. More research is needed, in various geographic locations and heterogeneous populations, to devise the normative data of oscillometric parameters. Simultaneously, there is an urgent need for standardization of available machines at global platform.
The practical difficulties of using spirometry in a 3-year-old girl are highlighted, especially during the COVID-19 era. Oscillometry, a tidal breath-based technique, has shown promising future to reliably assess lung functions in the vulnerable cohort. A simple algorithmic approach has been provided till reference values can be established with multicenter studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.