2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge based multi-source, time series classification: A case study of central region of Kenya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the increase in OA happened in both models (XGBoost and RF) signify the general importance of the indices in the classification. This result confirms previous studies that have shown that the addition of indices to the spectral bands results in classification improvements [89]. For example, Matongera et al [43] achieved a 19.94% improvement in classification accuracy after the addition of vegetation indices; Mudereri et al [78] had a 1% improvement in detection of Striga weed; while Hurskainen et al [88] achieved an increase of 16.5 percentage points after the addition of auxiliary features which included vegetation and topographic indices in a heterogeneous savanna landscape landcover classification.…”
Section: Model Evaluation and Spatial Coveragesupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the increase in OA happened in both models (XGBoost and RF) signify the general importance of the indices in the classification. This result confirms previous studies that have shown that the addition of indices to the spectral bands results in classification improvements [89]. For example, Matongera et al [43] achieved a 19.94% improvement in classification accuracy after the addition of vegetation indices; Mudereri et al [78] had a 1% improvement in detection of Striga weed; while Hurskainen et al [88] achieved an increase of 16.5 percentage points after the addition of auxiliary features which included vegetation and topographic indices in a heterogeneous savanna landscape landcover classification.…”
Section: Model Evaluation and Spatial Coveragesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Additionally, DEM and topographic variables such as slope, aspect [85], and Terrain Wetness Index (TWI) [86], which are known to aid improved decision making for classification tasks, were also included [87][88][89]. Furthermore, these topographic variables do affect temperature, precipitation, radiation regimes, and moisture demands attributes that indirectly affect vegetation dynamics and microclimates [90].…”
Section: Extracting Predictor Variables For Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Wang et al, (2018), in the Xitiaoxi River Basin, analyzed the spatial patterns of LULC changes from 1985 to 2008 and reported that dominant trend of land-use conversion was between forest-grass land and agricultural land, and the diminishing portion of forest-grass land and agricultural land contributed to the expansion of urban land during the period 1985-2008. Similar trend was also pointed out by Birhanu et al, (2019), in the Gumara catchment, Ethiopia, between 1986and 2015 where the area under forest and grass land was about 11 and 18%, respectively, in 1986, which reduced to 5 and 10%, respectively, in 2015. Also noted was that cultivated land increased from 70% in 1986 to 82% in 2015.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The main reason for the above changes could be attributed the rising human population and economic growth in the area. A study by Mwaniki and Möller (2015) , reported similar results in some sections of Central Kenya about a massive forest on the decline between 1995 and 2002, and a slight rise of forest areas between 2002 and 2010. At this time the Kenyan government had addressed the issue of deforestation and was putting measures to curb the problem for example through the introduction of the Nyayo Tea Zones which created as a "tea boundary" at the national park (Willkomm et al, 2016).…”
Section: Spatial and Temporal Variations In Land Use And Land Cover Changesmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…This transformation is often accompanied by losses in forestlands, grasslands, wetlands, and other features of ecological importance (Lark et al 2020;Zeng et al 2018). Empirical evidence suggests that human actions are central to LULCCs (Mwaniki and Möller 2015). These changes vary across diverse spatial scales and magnitudes based on underlying biophysical and climatic conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%