2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge complementarity and knowledge exchange in supply channel relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
43
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(105 reference statements)
5
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Holland (2010) suggested that knowledge sharing will help reduce the risks faced by organizations. It's necessary for banks to create an efficient system that is easy for employees and staff to share their information and knowledge because interorganizational knowledge sharing will foster collaborative resource coordination, allocation, and integration across different members of a supply chain to achieve their targets (Kim et al, 2012;Shih et al, 2012) Knowledge sharing among employees plays an important role in success of a firm because it will improve the critical knowledge, skill, and abilities of employees in customer relationship management. There are few researches that focus on identifying factors that affect knowledge sharing.…”
Section: Knowledge Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Holland (2010) suggested that knowledge sharing will help reduce the risks faced by organizations. It's necessary for banks to create an efficient system that is easy for employees and staff to share their information and knowledge because interorganizational knowledge sharing will foster collaborative resource coordination, allocation, and integration across different members of a supply chain to achieve their targets (Kim et al, 2012;Shih et al, 2012) Knowledge sharing among employees plays an important role in success of a firm because it will improve the critical knowledge, skill, and abilities of employees in customer relationship management. There are few researches that focus on identifying factors that affect knowledge sharing.…”
Section: Knowledge Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Erre az egyik legérdekesebb példa Erridge (2000), aki könyvében az együttműködés professzionális oktatása nyomán elérhető alacsonyabb költségekről számol be. Tehát az együttműködés ilyen módját is kifejezetten a közös beszerzés gyakorlati példái közé sorolja Kim et al (2012) az együttműködő és az opportunista szervezetközi viselkedési formát azonosítja. A kutatás eleve arra épít, hogy mennyi minden múlik a szereplők saját döntésén, bizalmán, hozzáállásán és ennek megfelelően együttműködési készségén, kockázatvállalási képességén, tudásmegosztás szintjén.…”
Section: A Beszerzési Szervezetek Közötti Koordinációunclassified
“…The key defining characteristic is that there should be only one tender published on behalf of all participating authorities. 11 Based on the definitions used by the LEAP Toolkit, there are several benefits for contracting authorities engaging in joint procurement arrangements, such as securing lower prices, administrative cost savings, better skills and expertise. 12 The Green Public Procurement (GPP Toolkit), based on the LEAP Toolkit, goes a step further in the hope of gaining additional advantages via joint procurementsuch as securing customers for environmentally innovative solutions, reducing the price of environmentally sound products and services, introducing new products onto national markets, standardising environmental demands and pooling environmental expertise.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%