2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00665.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge embedded in process: the self‐organization of skilled noun learning

Abstract: Young children's skilled generalization of newly learned nouns to new instances has become the battleground for two very different approaches to cognition. This debate is a proxy for a larger dispute in cognitive science and cognitive development: cognition as rule‐like amodal propositions, on the one hand, or as embodied, modal, and dynamic processes on the other. After a brief consideration of this theoretical backdrop, we turn to the specific task set before us: an overview of the Attentional Learning Accou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
62
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
5
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This preference was especially noteworthy in the disambiguation trials of both studies where children should have favored the distracter. In addition, this overall preference for the matching object suggests that amodal features like shape may be processed with a richness and depth not often described in the word-learning literature (although, see Colunga & Smith, 2008;Samuelson & Smith, 1998). However, that this preference was apparent in response to various types of auditory information in the current paradigm may also be viewed as potentially problematic because it leaves unclear whether children make meaningful distinctions between the types of auditory information they receive during episodes of multimodal word learning and, ultimately, whether the word plays a unique role in episodes of multimodal word learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This preference was especially noteworthy in the disambiguation trials of both studies where children should have favored the distracter. In addition, this overall preference for the matching object suggests that amodal features like shape may be processed with a richness and depth not often described in the word-learning literature (although, see Colunga & Smith, 2008;Samuelson & Smith, 1998). However, that this preference was apparent in response to various types of auditory information in the current paradigm may also be viewed as potentially problematic because it leaves unclear whether children make meaningful distinctions between the types of auditory information they receive during episodes of multimodal word learning and, ultimately, whether the word plays a unique role in episodes of multimodal word learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…, or by the basic perceptual and cognitive machinery that supports many types of learning (Colunga & Smith, 2008;Samuelson & Smith, 1998; though see Booth & Waxman, 2008). These are often seen as competing accounts, though there have been attempts to integrate various components of the accounts into a single framework for explaining word learning (e.g., Hollich et al, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The first approach holds that the shape bias in word learning contexts is acquired by attentional learning in the course of early (count) noun acquisition (Smith et al, 1996; Colunga and Smith, 2005, 2008). According to this account, toddlers learn a system of statistical regularities that establish a link between linguistic devices, the properties of objects, and perceptual category organization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novel objects are depicted in Figure 3 and consisted of fifteen toys from three categories not familiar to 2-year-old children. Novel exemplars from a given category shared basic shape but differed in overall number of shared features, based on evidence that preschool children can differentiate shape components in 3D objects (or "geons" [27,28]) and categorise solid objects on the basis of shared shape [29,30,22]. Thus, within each novel category, exemplars shared more or fewer perceptual features (geons, colour) with other exemplars of that category.…”
Section: Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%