2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2018.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge empowered prominent aspect extraction from product reviews

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rana et al identified some domainrelated aspects on the basis of dual rules (Rana & Cheah, 2017). Luo et al used knowledge resources, such as WordNet and the new method, based on corpus statistics to extract the most appropriate aspect (Luo et al, 2019). Zhang et al (2016) extracted feature keywords by the ICTCLAS system, and proposed the associated semantic mining algorithm to mine the semantic relations among keywords.…”
Section: Unsupervised Learning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rana et al identified some domainrelated aspects on the basis of dual rules (Rana & Cheah, 2017). Luo et al used knowledge resources, such as WordNet and the new method, based on corpus statistics to extract the most appropriate aspect (Luo et al, 2019). Zhang et al (2016) extracted feature keywords by the ICTCLAS system, and proposed the associated semantic mining algorithm to mine the semantic relations among keywords.…”
Section: Unsupervised Learning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A set of rules are applied for aspect extraction. Luo et al [59] define a new problem of extracting prominent aspects from customer review corpora. They also create a new evaluation dataset for prominent aspects extraction.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image cognition is an important part of product design. Many scholars proposed different algorithms regarding cognitive matching of the nature of imagery vocabulary and established a variety of noumenon for product knowledge representation from different aspects [ 42 ], which was used to find the element matching pair between two ontology concepts [ 43 ].…”
Section: Theory Background and Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%