2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-50841-8_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge Exchange at Science-Policy Interfaces in the Fields of Spatial Planning, Land Use and Soil Management: A Swiss Case Study

Abstract: In this article, we investigate knowledge exchange at the intersection of science and Swiss public policy in the fields of spatial planning, land use and soil management. Based on a literature review and expert interviews, we identify six types of knowledge exchange, and examine the barriers to and opportunities for knowledge exchange. These six underlying concepts suggest knowledge exchange is a challenging task because different expectations exist on how knowledge should be exchanged.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model of the science-policy interface employed is that of cogenerative and participatory knowledge development (Table 1), with joint fact-finding and knowledge co-production among scientists, policy, management, and other stakeholders (van Enst et al, 2014). This model is considered most appropriate for environmental management situations where there are many stakeholders working at broad scales and across jurisdictions (Pütz & Brassel, 2021). The approach generates a large, cross-disciplinary consortium that seeks to achieve common understanding and knowledge using participatory approaches to test alternative scenarios.…”
Section: Science Engagement With Policy and Management In The Murray-...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model of the science-policy interface employed is that of cogenerative and participatory knowledge development (Table 1), with joint fact-finding and knowledge co-production among scientists, policy, management, and other stakeholders (van Enst et al, 2014). This model is considered most appropriate for environmental management situations where there are many stakeholders working at broad scales and across jurisdictions (Pütz & Brassel, 2021). The approach generates a large, cross-disciplinary consortium that seeks to achieve common understanding and knowledge using participatory approaches to test alternative scenarios.…”
Section: Science Engagement With Policy and Management In The Murray-...mentioning
confidence: 99%