2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge exchange in clusters: The contingent role of regional inventive concentration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It requires the focal organization and its collaborators to establish agreements about how they are going to operate (Chapman et al, 2018). Such agreements attract high transaction costs and tend to be more effective when they are based on trust and reciprocity (Vestal and Danneels, 2018). As a result, they need to account for the needs and idiosyncrasies of each organization, to articulate the key deliverables, and to explain how knowledge will be shared and who will own any intellectual property that emerges from it.…”
Section: The Effect Of Formal Innovation Collaboration Breadthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It requires the focal organization and its collaborators to establish agreements about how they are going to operate (Chapman et al, 2018). Such agreements attract high transaction costs and tend to be more effective when they are based on trust and reciprocity (Vestal and Danneels, 2018). As a result, they need to account for the needs and idiosyncrasies of each organization, to articulate the key deliverables, and to explain how knowledge will be shared and who will own any intellectual property that emerges from it.…”
Section: The Effect Of Formal Innovation Collaboration Breadthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, an open innovation strategy may require the management of intense collaborations (Laursen and Salter, 2006), which involve formal agreements that outline the way collaborators will work together and how they will share any benefits. It thus generates network inertia (Tai-Young et al, 2006), which can lead to structural rigidities (Tomlinson, 2010;Vestal and Danneels, 2018). As a result, when an innovation activity is abandoned, openness may also have negative implications on how the new product development process is managed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The close contact within the subgroup provides members with stable resources and channels for information communication, reducing the knowledge search risk. The bridging relationship outside the subgroup establishes a communication channel for different subgroups, bringing heterogeneous knowledge to the subgroup members [ 47 ]. Especially, firms occupying an important position in the network can easily attract members outside the group to actively introduce their innovative resources and diversified knowledge to bridge the relationships built between groups [ 48 ].…”
Section: Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of corporate social responsibility on investment efficiency and innovation (Cook et al, 2019) Knowledge exchange in clusters: The contingent role of regional inventive concentration (Vestal and Danneels, 2018) 27…”
Section: Figure 3 Research Fronts "Complete Dataset"mentioning
confidence: 99%