Knowledge Gaps or Change of Distribution Ranges? Explaining New Records of Birds in the Ecuadorian Tumbesian Region of Endemism

Abstract

The change in the distribution range is a common response of various species facing the effects of anthropogenic global change. We used new distribution records of birds reported during the last two decades from the Ecuadorian part of the Tumbesian region (western Ecuador and northwestern Peru) available through a bibliographic review, together with our own field data collected during 2014–2019, and generated a methodology that explored whether these new reports are likely due to knowledge gaps or changes in the distribution range. We classified the species with new records as either Change of distribution range, Likely change of distribution range, Accidental, Knowledge gap, or Undetermined based on information about the distribution area, species conspicuousness, and dynamics of the records in the new location. We gathered data for 46 bird species newly reported in the Ecuadorian Tumbesian region in the last two decades. Of this, 35% of species were classified as Accidental, 24% as Knowledge gaps, 22% as Change of distribution range, 15% as Undetermined, and 4% as Likely change of distribution range. Species classified as Change of distribution range were mostly aquatic. Terrestrial species were mostly classified as Knowledge gap, while aquatic species were mostly classified as Accidental. Our protocol was validated using species which are known to have modified their distribution range in the Palearctic region, all of which were correctly classified by our methodology. The proposed method was precise and easy to apply and will allow us to better understand how species respond to anthropogenic global change, especially in areas where long-term studies are scarce, such as in tropical areas.

Scientific Research in Ecuador: A Bibliometric Analysis

“…In the South American context, its relations with Brazil, Colombia and Mexico are due to their proximity and geopolitical relations in their cooperation and collaboration agreements, especially with Colombia as they are bordering neighbours and share part of the Amazon region [20]. This international collaboration is given in general terms by the megadiversity of the regions of Ecuador, the presence of natural laboratories (Galapagos Islands and the Ecuadorian Amazon), the appearance of new endemic species [16], their international recognition as World Heritage Sites and Global Geoparks [7], as well as for its cultural, gastronomic and tourist diversity. These characteristics have led Ecuador to awaken the interest of the world scientific community in recent years.…”

“…The first is one of the most pristine places on the planet, [10], and received attention from the academy since the 18th century due to Charles Darwin's research [11][12][13] and subsequent contributions that allowed it to be declared as a natural heritage of humanity [14]. Galápagos is also considered one of the 137 irreplaceable protected areas globally [15], a hotspot of endemism [16] and a priority region for conservation [17]. The Ecuadorian Amazon is a relevant ecological zone due to the abundance of tropical forests found in this region and the most remarkable biological diversity globally [15,18].…”

A roadmap to identifying and filling shortfalls in Neotropical ornithology

“…Wallacean shortfalls remain especially pervasive in the Neotropics given the inaccessibility of remote regions such as mountain ranges or corners of Amazonia that also sustain Linnaean shortfalls. Although ornithologists and birders are improving our understanding of coarse-scale ranges for many species -as evidenced by the relatively frequent discovery of major range extensions -our knowledge of specific habitat associations and derived distributions remains poor for most species and regions (Engler et al 2017) and especially in the tropics (Orihuela-Torres et al 2020).…”

Unravelling the vertebrate scavenger assemblage in the Gobi Desert, Mongolia

“…As happens with other vertebrate groups (Amano et al, 2016;Orihuela-Torres et al, 2020), there are spatial gaps in the knowledge about vertebrate scavenger assemblages worldwide. The vast majority of studies focused on North America and Europe, and to a lesser extent, on Australia and Southern Africa (Sebastián-González et al, 2019.…”