Knowledge Hubs of Russia: Bibliometric Mapping of Research Activity

Mikhaylov, Andrey S.; Mikhaylova, Anna A.; Hvaley, Dmitry

doi:10.5530/jscires.9.1.1

Cited by 14 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Scientometrics as meta-analysis (Kullenberg and Kasperowski, 2016 ) focusses on knowledge production, the spatiality of knowledge production, and knowledge relationships between the network of global actors (Moravcsik, 1985 ; Frenken et al, 2009 ; Albort-Morant et al, 2017 ; Vega-Muñoz and Salinas-Galindo, 2017 ; Mikhaylov et al, 2020 ). Scientometrics relationally studies knowledge production, moving the author's gaze toward spatial and organizational co-authorship, as well as research field themes.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To answer those research questions, authors use a scientometric analytic methodology. According to Kullenberg and Kasperowski (2016), scientometrics meta-analysis examines the production of knowledge, its spatiality, and the relationship between the network of global actors (Moravcsik, 1985;Frenken et al, 2009;Albort-Morant et al, 2017;Vega-Muñoz and Salinas-Galindo, 2017;Mikhaylov et al, 2020). This study focuses on establishing levels of spatial, organizational, and thematic co-authorship using VOSviewer for entrepreneurial wellbeing knowledge production (Van Eck and Waltman, 2010;Köseoglu et al, 2018;Lojo et al, 2019;González-Serrano et al, 2020;Vega-Muñoz et al, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Scientometric Systematic Review of Entrepreneurial Wellbeing Knowledge Production

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents a scientometric study regarding entrepreneurship and its relationship with wellbeing. The study presents a systematic review and measures impact and relational character to identify the relevance of countries, research organizations, and authors in the field of entrepreneurial wellbeing. The study poses the following research questions: What is the nature of the evolution of scientific knowledge in the entrepreneurial wellbeing field? What is the nature of the concentration in terms of geographical distribution and co-authorship level of knowledge production in the entrepreneurial wellbeing field? What are the knowledge trends in knowledge production for entrepreneurial wellbeing literature? The contribution of this research is two-fold. First, in terms of methodology, it contributes study into the use of a more robust approach to search for the scientometric trends about entrepreneurship wellbeing in addition to the PRISMA review tools and the PICOS eligibility criteria. Secondly, the study presents research updates in the search for results for the last 2 years of knowledge production. This upgrade is particularly important in a research field that presents exponential growth, where 2019 and 2020 presented almost double the amount of knowledge production compared to 2017 and 2018.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Scientometric Systematic Review of Entrepreneurial Wellbeing Knowledge Production

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Zipf's law on words was applied to empirically determine words with the highest frequency of occurrence in the set of articles studied (author keywords, keywords plus, or key terms in titles or the abstract) [99]. Information processing and the visualization of spatiality, co-authorship, and co-occurrence [100][101][102] were processed with VOSviewer Software, using fragmentation analysis with thematic and time trend visualization outputs [103,104].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric Mapping of Research Trends on Financial Behavior for Sustainability

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents a global empirical overview of studies on financial behavior in relation to education, money-saving, and consumption, contributing to research on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) related to social equity in the quality education (4th Sustainable Development Goal) and inequality reduction (10th Sustainable Development Goal) areas. Thus, the data and metadata of 492 articles registered between 1992 and August 2021 were extracted from the Web of Science (Journal Citation Report, JCR) and analyzed with a bibliometric approach, using classical methodological laws and the specialized software VOSviewer. Among the results, we highlight the exponential scientific production growth in the last decades, the concentration in only twelve specific journals indexed in the Journal Citation Report, the global hegemony of US universities in institutional co-authorship networks, and the thematic and temporal segregation of the concepts of financial behavior. We conclude an evolution of two decades in the relevant topics and a concentration in three large blocks: (1) financial education; (2) savings and consumption decisions; (3) financial literacy and investments, which are a temporal evolution that gives for the irruption of diverse visions in the relationship between the evolution of individual financial behavior and the global market. Given it is necessary to know the impact of financial education and financial literacy on personal savings, consumption, and investment behaviors, a larger study on financial behavior could be conducted with this research and an assessment of these results.

show abstract

“…The initial search for articles was strengthened with the use of scientometrics [78] that were used recently in topics related to articles by Sun et al [79], Stojanovic et al [80], Wang et al [81], and Vega-Muñoz et al [82]. The use of scientometrics in a meta-analysis [83] focuses on knowledge production, the spatiality of knowledge production, and knowledge relationships within the network of global actors [84,85], allowing the initial selection of articles to be refined based on a search vector using field labels, wildcards, and operators (Boolean, proximity, and priority) [86]. Its incorporation of sequential mixed use with the PRISMA guidelines has also been addressed previously [87][88][89].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

How to Measure Environmental Performance in Ports

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Oceans, seas, and marine resources are highly relevant for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Such relevance has given rise to the blue economy approach, where scholars and policymakers see activities carried out in cargo ports from a different perspective. The blue economy approach stresses the emergence of multiple transnational networks in relation to these topics and the development of green ports plus environmental measurements at seaports in general. In this context, our study aimed to review the various scientifically documented methods for measuring environmental performance in ports, ports companies, or port authorities in the maritime transport and inland waterways framework. The study followed a scientometric meta-analytic methodology to accomplish its goals. The study strictly referred to the Environmental Performance in Ports (EPP) and extracted the corpus to analyze data held in five databases embedded in the Web of Science Core Collection. Then, the selection was processed and refined with the PRISMA guidelines to establish the eligibility criteria for articles with the PICOS (Population, Interventions, Comparators, Outcomes, and Study) tool. A limited study set was identified. This included port environmental performance indicators and studies that were strongly influenced by the European Sea Ports Organization and Green Marine networks. These were compared based on the ecological Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), scale structure, and diversity in application. Finally, we assessed two measurement forms documented in the scientific research on the subject at a global level and discussed their pros and cons.

show abstract

Knowledge Hubs of Russia: Bibliometric Mapping of Research Activity

Cited by 14 publications

References 0 publications

A Scientometric Systematic Review of Entrepreneurial Wellbeing Knowledge Production

A Scientometric Systematic Review of Entrepreneurial Wellbeing Knowledge Production

Bibliometric Mapping of Research Trends on Financial Behavior for Sustainability

How to Measure Environmental Performance in Ports

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About