2021
DOI: 10.4018/ijhisi.20210401.oa3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge Inferencing Using Artificial Bee Colony and Rough Set for Diagnosis of Hepatitis Disease

Abstract: Vast volumes of raw data are generated from the digital world each day. Acquiring useful information and chief features from this data is challenging, and it has become a prime area of current research. Another crucial area is knowledge inferencing. Much research has been carried out in both directions. Swarm intelligence is used for feature selection whereas for knowledge inferencing either fuzzy or rough computing is widely used. Hybridization of intelligent and swarm intelligence techniques are booming rece… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies from machine learning shows prediction of road accidents and thereby developing a smart transportation system using different machine learning models have been used by where the highest mean accuracy was achieved from Decision Tree. Artificial bee colony and rough set hybridization technique was used by Acharjya et. al (2021) which was applied on a hepatitis dataset and the proposed model helps in detection of the disease accurately with an accuracy of 96.2%.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies from machine learning shows prediction of road accidents and thereby developing a smart transportation system using different machine learning models have been used by where the highest mean accuracy was achieved from Decision Tree. Artificial bee colony and rough set hybridization technique was used by Acharjya et. al (2021) which was applied on a hepatitis dataset and the proposed model helps in detection of the disease accurately with an accuracy of 96.2%.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%