2013
DOI: 10.7813/jee.2013/4-1/6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge management and strategic decision making in the Jordanian public sector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Swiss (1992) considers the implementation of TQM principles in the public sector as a waste of time since its works are restricted by legal requirements in addition to the wide variety of customers which make the process of acquiring their feedback very difficult and almost unattainable. Despite Swiss's arguments, most public services organizations continue to pay extra attention to the quality issues that enable them to maintain their customer satisfaction (Apornak, 2017), eliminate waste, reduce the time associated with re-work efforts, and enhance the maturity level of quality issues amongst their employees (Al-Madi et al , 2013; Keramati et al , 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Swiss (1992) considers the implementation of TQM principles in the public sector as a waste of time since its works are restricted by legal requirements in addition to the wide variety of customers which make the process of acquiring their feedback very difficult and almost unattainable. Despite Swiss's arguments, most public services organizations continue to pay extra attention to the quality issues that enable them to maintain their customer satisfaction (Apornak, 2017), eliminate waste, reduce the time associated with re-work efforts, and enhance the maturity level of quality issues amongst their employees (Al-Madi et al , 2013; Keramati et al , 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leadership and management commitment; customer focus; people management; strategic planning; processes management; rewards and recognition; and employee involvement all acted as the independent variables. The KM processes were adopted from the following studies: Andriani et al (2019), Chang and Lin (2015), Zwain (2012), Hoe (2006), Bhatt et al (2005) and Al-Madi et al (2013) and represented the dependent variables. The model aimed to demonstrate how the dimensions and processes may fit together and impact on each other.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%