2018
DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2018.1468247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge management and total quality management: foundations, intellectual structures, insights regarding evolution of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 156 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Marchiori [31] and Choo [32] addresses these differences by stating that information management (IM) has as a goal to optimize the usefulness and contribution of information resources to achieve the objectives of the organization. However, according to Gold et al [33] and Koentjoro and Gunawan [34], effective knowledge management, from the perspective of organizational capabilities, suggests a knowledge infrastructure that should include five key elements: (1) technology, the systems, tools, and technologies properly designed and implemented for the needs of the organization; (2) structure; (3) organizational culture, i.e., that which influences the way people interact, the context within which knowledge is created, the resistance they have to certain changes, and, ultimately, the way knowledge is shared or not; (4) a knowledge process architecture of acquisition, conversion, application, and protection; and (5) leadership [35,36].…”
Section: Where Did It Happen?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marchiori [31] and Choo [32] addresses these differences by stating that information management (IM) has as a goal to optimize the usefulness and contribution of information resources to achieve the objectives of the organization. However, according to Gold et al [33] and Koentjoro and Gunawan [34], effective knowledge management, from the perspective of organizational capabilities, suggests a knowledge infrastructure that should include five key elements: (1) technology, the systems, tools, and technologies properly designed and implemented for the needs of the organization; (2) structure; (3) organizational culture, i.e., that which influences the way people interact, the context within which knowledge is created, the resistance they have to certain changes, and, ultimately, the way knowledge is shared or not; (4) a knowledge process architecture of acquisition, conversion, application, and protection; and (5) leadership [35,36].…”
Section: Where Did It Happen?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their relationship has been approached from different perspectives and, in many cases, partial aspects have been studied which hinder the understanding of the complexity of this relationship. After a review of the literature and a bibliometric analysis, Marchiori and Mendes (2018) identified, on the one hand, studies that put the emphasis on how the principles and practices of QM can serve as a starting point to implement KM initiatives, effectively and efficiently. Other works accentuate the fact that KM is a critical element for the success of the QM initiatives and for obtaining better results.…”
Section: Relationship Between Knowledge Quality and Excellence Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interactions formed from the application of these techniques were exposed in network maps (Li et al , 2016; Marchiori and Mendes, 2018), being that, each map is calculated by measuring the force of interaction between terms, which takes into account the number of links between the terms (Van Eck and Waltman, 2010; Waltman et al , 2010). Graphically, the terms (which, in this case, are articles or keywords) are represented by nodes and colour clusters, so that larger nodes represent more relevant terms than smaller nodes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%