Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
This empirical study examines how chief knowledge officers (CKOs) interpret measurements performed in knowledge management systems (KMS) and reflected in business intelligence dashboards. Specifically, it investigates CKOs' perceptions of common KMS indicators and their relationship to knowledge management (KM) success. Adopting a constructivist inductive approach, the study relies on qualitative data from interviews, focus groups, and cyber‐ethnography. The findings reveal that usage statistics, like system logins, do not necessarily signify the value of KM initiatives and that organizations avoid linking KMS metrics to business performance. By contributing vital insights to KMS performance literature, we indicate the limitations inherent in current evaluation approaches focused narrowly on usage quantification. Practical implications suggest combining quantitative monitoring of access frequency and patterns with KMS benefits qualitative assessments. Overall, the juxtaposition of usage data against perceived value provides an important perspective on developing more meaningful and effective KMS performance measurements.
This empirical study examines how chief knowledge officers (CKOs) interpret measurements performed in knowledge management systems (KMS) and reflected in business intelligence dashboards. Specifically, it investigates CKOs' perceptions of common KMS indicators and their relationship to knowledge management (KM) success. Adopting a constructivist inductive approach, the study relies on qualitative data from interviews, focus groups, and cyber‐ethnography. The findings reveal that usage statistics, like system logins, do not necessarily signify the value of KM initiatives and that organizations avoid linking KMS metrics to business performance. By contributing vital insights to KMS performance literature, we indicate the limitations inherent in current evaluation approaches focused narrowly on usage quantification. Practical implications suggest combining quantitative monitoring of access frequency and patterns with KMS benefits qualitative assessments. Overall, the juxtaposition of usage data against perceived value provides an important perspective on developing more meaningful and effective KMS performance measurements.
PurposeWhile scholars agree on the complexity of knowledge management processes (KMPs), achieving a comprehensive understanding of these processes and how they integrate into the core organizational processes still proves challenging. In response to this research gap, this study presents a pioneering, inductive exploration into the views of chief knowledge officers (CKOs).Design/methodology/approachWe employed an interpretative multiple-case study methodology, conducting semi-structured interviews with 28 CKOs across diverse industry sectors. Thematic analysis was utilized to analyze the data.FindingsThe CKOs’ insights reveal that the degree of “superposition and overlap” between KMPs and business processes is pivotal to the effectiveness of both knowledge management (KM) and business operations. The study introduces the concept of “transparent KM,” where KM becomes an imperceptible yet indispensable element of the organizational structure. This challenges the conventional notion of KM as an isolated discipline and highlights the dangers of artificially segregating KMPs from core business processes, which can result in employee disengagement and managerial doubts about the value of KM.Originality/valueThis research contributes to a novel vision of KM, advocating for the seamless integration of KMPs into organizational processes. It suggests that KM should be considered a ubiquitous force that naturally enhances organizational workflows. Scholars, practitioners and company leaders, in designing business processes, should take into consideration their KM implications and, in turn, potentially reshaping the strategic role of KM in organizations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.