Knowledge mobilization activities to support decision-making by youth, parents, and adults using a systematic and living map of evidence and recommendations on COVID-19: protocol for three randomized controlled trials and qualitative user-experience studies

Abstract

Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic underlined that guidelines and recommendations must be made more accessible and more understandable to the general public to improve health outcomes. The objective of this study is to evaluate, quantify, and compare the public’s understanding, usability, satisfaction, intention to implement, and preference for different ways of presenting COVID-19 health recommendations derived from the COVID-19 Living Map of Recommendations and Gateway to Contextualization (RecMap). Methods and analysis This is a protocol for a multi-method study. Through an online survey, we will conduct pragmatic allocation-concealed, blinded superiority randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in three populations to test alternative formats of presenting health recommendations: adults, parents, and youth, with at least 240 participants in each population. Prior to initiating the RCT, our interventions will have been refined with relevant stakeholder input. The intervention arm will receive a plain language recommendation (PLR) format while the control arm will receive the corresponding original recommendation format as originally published by the guideline organizations (standard language version). Our primary outcome is understanding, and our secondary outcomes are accessibility and usability, satisfaction, intended behavior, and preference for the recommendation formats. Each population’s results will be analyzed separately. However, we are planning a meta-analysis of the results across populations. At the end of each survey, participants will be invited to participate in an optional one-on-one, virtual semi-structured interview to explore their user experience. All interviews will be transcribed and analyzed using the principles of thematic analysis and a hybrid inductive and deductive approach. Ethics and dissemination Through Clinical Trials Ontario, the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board has reviewed and approved this protocol (Project ID: 3856). The University of Alberta has approved the parent portion of the trial (Project ID:00114894). Findings from this study will be disseminated through open-access publications in peer-reviewed journals and using social media. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05358990. Registered on May 3, 2022

Plain Language vs Standard Format for Youth Understanding of COVID-19 Recommendations

“…The protocol for the trials in the 3 populations (adults, parents, and youths) is included in Supplement 1 . In brief, each was a pragmatic, 2-arm, allocation-concealed, blinded, superiority RCT conducted online using a survey for measuring primary and secondary outcomes combined with qualitative interviews among a subset of self-selected trial participants.…”

“…The protocol for the trials in the 3 populations (adults, parents, and youths) is included in Supplement 1. 11 In brief, each was a pragmatic, 2-arm, allocation-concealed, blinded, superiority RCT conducted online using a survey for measuring primary and secondary outcomes combined with qualitative interviews among a subset of self-selected trial participants. Researchers from The Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, led the design and conduct of the youth trial and recruited youths aged 15 to 24 years worldwide to investigate superiority of either PLRs or SLVs from May 27 to July 6, 2022.…”