2011
DOI: 10.1504/ijird.2011.042188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge networks in innovation among small KIBS firms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This denotes that, under certain conditions, internal knowledge plays a primary role in the development of innovations. On the other hand, internal resources may be insufficient: innovative activities can also, in many cases, dependent on external and complementary knowledge sources (Tödtling et al, 2006;Doloreux and Shearmur, 2010;Siikonen et al, 2011, Malerba, 2007.In summary, it may be argued that the proclivity to use a specific source of knowledge can change from a company to another, in relation to the innovation type (e.g. technological, commercial, managerial), the nature (more or less tacit) of the needed knowledge, and the adopted innovation patterns (Amara et al, 2010;Consoli and Helche, 2013;Bolisani et al, 2014).…”
Section: Sources and Approaches To Innovation Knowledge In Kibsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This denotes that, under certain conditions, internal knowledge plays a primary role in the development of innovations. On the other hand, internal resources may be insufficient: innovative activities can also, in many cases, dependent on external and complementary knowledge sources (Tödtling et al, 2006;Doloreux and Shearmur, 2010;Siikonen et al, 2011, Malerba, 2007.In summary, it may be argued that the proclivity to use a specific source of knowledge can change from a company to another, in relation to the innovation type (e.g. technological, commercial, managerial), the nature (more or less tacit) of the needed knowledge, and the adopted innovation patterns (Amara et al, 2010;Consoli and Helche, 2013;Bolisani et al, 2014).…”
Section: Sources and Approaches To Innovation Knowledge In Kibsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phelan and Sharpley (2012) explain that skills include the ability to sense, act, and turn a problem into a profitable business proposal (Teece, 2012). Siikonen et al (2011) show that business skills are a learning process that affects individual characteristics, which combine talent and education or training (science) to become a strategist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For companies involved in innovation ecosystems (Adner & Kapoor, 2010;Autio & Thomas, 2014;Jackson, 2011;Valkokari, 2015), this implies that they can no longer develop new technologies -much less new products and serviceson their own, but instead need to cooperate with external organizations, including research institutes and other companies (Pellikka & Ali-Vehmas, 2016). This is particularly true for companies in knowledge-intensive industries that have seen an increase in external collaboration for creating and commercializing innovation (Dolata, 2016;Siikonen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%