2017
DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2016085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge of diabetes mellitus and safe practices during Ramadan fasting among Muslim patients with diabetes mellitus in Singapore

Abstract: INTRODUCTIONThis study aimed to explore the level of knowledge of Muslim patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) regarding DM and the self-management of DM when fasting during Ramadan. METHODSMuslim patients with DM attending the Diabetes Centre of Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, were surveyed on their knowledge of DM and self-management of DM when fasting during Ramadan. Data on patient demographics, DM history and management of DM during the previous Ramadan was also collected. RESULTS A total of 92 p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the literature review on diabetes self‐care and nutrition questionnaires at Stage 1, 68 questions were generated. After deliberation by the expert panel (details as mentioned earlier), it was decided that the first draft of the DRNK‐Q would consist of four sections: (1) Food portion and sizes , (2) Nutrition content of foods , (3) Healthier food choices and safety and (4) Food label reading , comprising a total of 59 questions, modified to suit the local context; the scoring system was as mentioned in Section 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the literature review on diabetes self‐care and nutrition questionnaires at Stage 1, 68 questions were generated. After deliberation by the expert panel (details as mentioned earlier), it was decided that the first draft of the DRNK‐Q would consist of four sections: (1) Food portion and sizes , (2) Nutrition content of foods , (3) Healthier food choices and safety and (4) Food label reading , comprising a total of 59 questions, modified to suit the local context; the scoring system was as mentioned in Section 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are currently three commonly used tools to assess diabetes self‐care knowledge. The first is the Diabetes Knowledge Test (DKT) to measure the diabetes self‐care knowledge of adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) or T2DM, validated for Malaysia and Singapore . However, 19 out of 23 items within the DKT are not related to diet and nutrition, hence precluding adequate assessment of DRNK.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean age of the examinee was 56.5±9.5 years which is like examination led in Oman in which the mean age was 54.3 ± 11.7. 14 In the current study 66% of the study sample of patients did not screen their blood glucose, which is a lot higher than detailed in Singapore where 37.3% of patients announced that they didn't screen their blood glucose 19 , observing blood glucose enables the patients to successfully self-oversee themselves, recognize and avoid scenes of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. In this study the level of patients who counseled a doctor previously to Ramadan fasting was 19.0 which is less than made reference to in Pakistan as 33.3% of patients counseled doctors pre Ramadan fasting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Although 89.3% of patient change their medication regime during Ramadan (Yaacob et al 2007), only 38.1-62.7% do SMBG during Ramadan (Zainudin et al 2017;Tan et al 2018 ), and 47% of patients had experience hypoglycaemia during fasting, out of which, 10.8% had continued to fast (Zainudin et al 2017). Many DM patients (24-82%) lacked knowledge on safe Ramadan fasting (Yaacob et al 2007;Zainudin et al 2017;Tan et al 2018). Regarding diet practice, 40-58% considered sugary food as acceptable during breaking fast (Yaacob et al 2007;Zainudin et al 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%