2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0093-934x(02)00014-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

18
219
4
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 304 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
18
219
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These two facts suggest that even in the final stages of her illness VZ might still rely on some knowledge of actions, perhaps supported by the activation of the affordance representation of objects. This interpretation is consistent with Buxbaum and Saffran (2002), who emphasize the role of "motor" knowledge (i.e., affordance) during the processing of objects. In this view, functional attributes are considered an indirect product of action0motor processing (see also Warrington & McCarthy, 1987;Tyler & Moss, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These two facts suggest that even in the final stages of her illness VZ might still rely on some knowledge of actions, perhaps supported by the activation of the affordance representation of objects. This interpretation is consistent with Buxbaum and Saffran (2002), who emphasize the role of "motor" knowledge (i.e., affordance) during the processing of objects. In this view, functional attributes are considered an indirect product of action0motor processing (see also Warrington & McCarthy, 1987;Tyler & Moss, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Knowledge of nonliving things seems to be partially sustained by functional information, and partially, but for a much longer time, by some kind of action or motor knowledge. In fact, functional and motor knowledge might be intertwined in the representations of nonliving things (Buxbaum & Saffran, 2002), which could be an interesting aspect to disentangle in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavioral studies of apraxia patients with left parietal or caudal middle frontal lobe lesions identify deficits in the retrieval and execution of actions based on verbal commands [Haaland et al, 2000;Heilman et al, 1982] imitation [Goldenberg et al, 1996] or object centered action goals [Buxbaum and Saffran, 2002]. It remains challenging to determine if the deficit in these cases is secondary to semantic access to a particular action, the organization of an action plan or the actual execution of a motor act.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a computer keyboard and piano), but appropriately match items with a similar function (e.g. a lighter and a matchstick both make a flame) (Buxbaum & Saffran, 2002;Myung et al, 2010;Lee, Mirman, & Buxbaum, 2014). Notably, an eye-tracking task found that apraxic patients took longer to fixate on manipulation-related stimuli compared to non-apraxics, indicating that processing of manipulation features of object-use is maintained but less accessible (Myung et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between apraxia and left IPL damage implies that apraxic symptoms may reflect a disruption to the ventro-dorsal stream resulting in impaired access to internal motor representations necessary for accurate perception of object-use manipulation (Haaland, Harrington, & Knight, 2000;Buxbaum & Saffran, 2002;Randerath, Li, Goldenberg, & Hermsdörfer, 2009;Buxbaum & Kalénine, 2010). Akin to the dissociations found in neuroimaging data, apraxic patients make errors matching objects manipulated similarly (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%