“…These factors, which could potentially impede or facilitate participant's awareness of PEP, were conceptually divided into different categories within the individual, social (including partners, families, and communities), and structural domains (health systems and legal factors). In the individual domain, low educational attainment, unemployment, having casual partners, and closeted bisexual were negative factors; high-level education, white race/ethnicity, gay sexual identity, knowing the HIV status of one's self, higher personal sexual altruism, metropolitan resident, higher annual Higher number of partners (11) Higher number of partners (39,42) Having casual partners (35) Higher personal sexual altruism (42) Metropolitan resident (8,42) Greater perceived agency to ask sexual partners' HIV status (42) Older age (31,35,37,40) Higher annual income (16,40,43) Having unprotected anal sex (40) Having sex under the influence of a drug (37,40,41) Younger age (16,32) Using Internet as the main way of meeting partners (39) Social factors Interaction with gay culture (39) Internet and community of MSM (33) Lower levels of HIV stigma (16,32) HIV leadership programming (31) Structural factors Disclosure of one's sexual orientation to general practitioner (11) Greater access to condoms (42) Previous HIV testing (11,15,32,38,43) Previous sexually transmitted infection (STI) diagnosis (38,42) Contact with HIV/AIDS organization…”