2023
DOI: 10.1007/s41347-023-00356-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge of Problem Solving (KOPS) Scale: Design and Evaluation of a Digitally Administered Competence Measure for a Common Practice Element in Task-Shared Youth Mental Health Interventions

Sonal Mathur,
Daniel Michelson,
Tejaswi Shetty
et al.

Abstract: There are few reliable and feasible quality assurance methods to support scaling up of psychological interventions delivered by non-specialist providers. This paper reports on the phased development and validation of a digitally administered Knowledge of Problem Solving (KOPS) measure to assess competencies associated with a “task-shared” problem-solving intervention for adolescents with diverse mental health problems in India. Phase 1 established key competencies required to deliver the intervention, followed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, the assessed items correspond to "knowing" and "knowing how" rather than "showing how" or "doing" in the nomenclature of Miller's (1990) hierarchy of clinical competency. Development and validation of the measure have been described elsewhere (Mathur et al, 2023a). The measure comprised five session vignettes for a hypothetical case, with each vignette followed by 3-4 multiple-choice questions that asked about the most appropriate response to a practice-based scenario.…”
Section: Primary Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the assessed items correspond to "knowing" and "knowing how" rather than "showing how" or "doing" in the nomenclature of Miller's (1990) hierarchy of clinical competency. Development and validation of the measure have been described elsewhere (Mathur et al, 2023a). The measure comprised five session vignettes for a hypothetical case, with each vignette followed by 3-4 multiple-choice questions that asked about the most appropriate response to a practice-based scenario.…”
Section: Primary Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%