2017
DOI: 10.1002/jum.14481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge of Safety, Training, and Practice of Neonatal Cranial Ultrasound: A Survey of Operators

Abstract: There is a need to educate operators on biosafety issues and approaches to minimize power outputs and reduce the overall duration of cranial ultrasound scans. Development of standardized training requirements may be warranted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, more and more studies are currently discussing potential risks and limited knowledge among health care professionals when it comes to applying high-energy levels in the neonatal brain, for example, through the use of Doppler sonography. 31 The same would seem to be true of SWE; thus practitioners should consider the applied energy, recommended maximum examination times, and potential risks such as tissue warming when using B-mode, Power Doppler, and SWE. But sonographic brain imaging seems to be reasonably low-risk compared with alternative imaging methods like MRI or CT, in which the administered energy levels are far higher and associated with potentially more dangerous biological risks especially where ionizing x-rays are involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, more and more studies are currently discussing potential risks and limited knowledge among health care professionals when it comes to applying high-energy levels in the neonatal brain, for example, through the use of Doppler sonography. 31 The same would seem to be true of SWE; thus practitioners should consider the applied energy, recommended maximum examination times, and potential risks such as tissue warming when using B-mode, Power Doppler, and SWE. But sonographic brain imaging seems to be reasonably low-risk compared with alternative imaging methods like MRI or CT, in which the administered energy levels are far higher and associated with potentially more dangerous biological risks especially where ionizing x-rays are involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When transcranial ultrasound is widely used, however, people tend to overlook the potential biological impacts. 18 The interaction between ultrasound and biological tissues has been fully confirmed, 19 mainly including thermal and mechanical effects. To evaluate the potential risks of ultrasound examinations, the US Food and Drug Administration implemented the output display standards, which mainly include measures of the thermal index and mechanical index.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In recent years, some researchers have begun to apply 2D SWE to identify neonatal encephalopathy with good results. When transcranial ultrasound is widely used, however, people tend to overlook the potential biological impacts 18 . The interaction between ultrasound and biological tissues has been fully confirmed, 19 mainly including thermal and mechanical effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, all investigators were properly trained and used to routinely perform cUS in our NICU in less than 15 minutes. The duration of exposure is known to be crucial for the risk of a thermal effect, 37,38 but B-GREAT measurements were all taken during a standard scan, recommended in the first days of life, and did not require extra examination time. Another possible bias in our growth charts is that from 32 weeks all measurements are not "first measurements"; thus, they do not represent intrauterine growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%