Dimensions of Vocabulary Knowledge 2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-137-36831-7_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge of the Written Word

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the more frequent bands were answered faster, but it seemed to take a relatively large vocabulary size (possibly 5,000) before faster test answering speed came into play across the board. However, when Miralpeix and Meara () gave 145 Spanish university students X‐Lex and Y‐Lex Yes/No size tests and timed semantic lexical decision tasks of whether target words were animate or inanimate, they found no correlation between vocabulary size and speed.…”
Section: Vocabulary Size and Depth Conceptualized As Lexical Fluencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the more frequent bands were answered faster, but it seemed to take a relatively large vocabulary size (possibly 5,000) before faster test answering speed came into play across the board. However, when Miralpeix and Meara () gave 145 Spanish university students X‐Lex and Y‐Lex Yes/No size tests and timed semantic lexical decision tasks of whether target words were animate or inanimate, they found no correlation between vocabulary size and speed.…”
Section: Vocabulary Size and Depth Conceptualized As Lexical Fluencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, the absence of significant correlation between percentage scores and oral ability in the study indicates potential problems with the frequency-based principle for assessing vocabulary knowledge (Nation & Webb, 2011). Therefore, in order to further investigate the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and L2 speaking ability, it is important to be aware of other aspects of vocabulary knowledge besides frequency such as L1 cognate (Bardel, Gudmundson, & Lindqvist, 2012), speed of lexical retrieval (Fitzpatrick & Izura, 2011;Miralpeix & Meara, 2014), abstractness (Crossley, Salsbury, & McNamara, 2009), sense relations (Crossley, Salsbury, & McNamara, 2010), richness and sophistication (Lu, 2012), and multi-word units (Kyle & Crossley, 2014).…”
Section: Productive Vocabulary Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Miralpeix and Meara (2010) explored the relation between vocabulary size and lexical access, by means of a Yes–No test and a lexical access task. Results showed that there was no significant correlation between size and speed of lexical access.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%