Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Background: People with mental illness often experience stigmatized attitudes from the general public and health professionals themselves. Objectives: This study aimed to examine and compare the attitude toward mental illness among nursing students at one of the government nursing colleges in Oman. Methods: The study used a cross-sectional approach, using a quantitative, descriptive-comparative design with a sample size of 177 students from first-, second-, and third-year nursing programs. The data were gathered through an online Google Survey Form using an adapted attitude Scale toward mental illness-Singapore Version (AMI-SG). The data was analyzed using descriptive analysis such as frequency, percentage, mean, median, standard deviation, and inferential statistics using ANOVA/t-test. Results: The study findings revealed that the overall attitude of nursing students in one of the public nursing colleges was positive (53.1%) toward the patient with mental illness. Most of the second (59.3%) and third-year (62.1%) students had positive attitudes compared to the first years (40%); however, the difference was not statistically significant (p>.05). Conclusion: Even though there was no significant difference in attitudes towards mental illness among different groups, overall, nursing students harbored a positive attitude towards patients. Overall, students were positive towards social distancing, social restrictiveness, prejudice, and misconception, except for tolerance/support for community care. Therefore, gaining insight into nursing students' tolerance/support towards mental illness needs further evaluation. Early exposure to mental health courses and awareness programs on mental issues may favor a positive attitude among future nursing professionals toward people with mental illness. The study calls for further studies with larger samples to validate our study findings with various health professionals to minimize the stigmatized attitude with a broader scope.
Background: People with mental illness often experience stigmatized attitudes from the general public and health professionals themselves. Objectives: This study aimed to examine and compare the attitude toward mental illness among nursing students at one of the government nursing colleges in Oman. Methods: The study used a cross-sectional approach, using a quantitative, descriptive-comparative design with a sample size of 177 students from first-, second-, and third-year nursing programs. The data were gathered through an online Google Survey Form using an adapted attitude Scale toward mental illness-Singapore Version (AMI-SG). The data was analyzed using descriptive analysis such as frequency, percentage, mean, median, standard deviation, and inferential statistics using ANOVA/t-test. Results: The study findings revealed that the overall attitude of nursing students in one of the public nursing colleges was positive (53.1%) toward the patient with mental illness. Most of the second (59.3%) and third-year (62.1%) students had positive attitudes compared to the first years (40%); however, the difference was not statistically significant (p>.05). Conclusion: Even though there was no significant difference in attitudes towards mental illness among different groups, overall, nursing students harbored a positive attitude towards patients. Overall, students were positive towards social distancing, social restrictiveness, prejudice, and misconception, except for tolerance/support for community care. Therefore, gaining insight into nursing students' tolerance/support towards mental illness needs further evaluation. Early exposure to mental health courses and awareness programs on mental issues may favor a positive attitude among future nursing professionals toward people with mental illness. The study calls for further studies with larger samples to validate our study findings with various health professionals to minimize the stigmatized attitude with a broader scope.
Mental disorders are considered as invisible disorders as they are overlooked by patients, caregivers, health professionals, and policymakers yet cause significant health burdens. People with mental illness are subjected to high levels of stigma and discrimination because of widely held misconceptions about the causes and nature of mental illness. varies from 43% to 83%. Stigma and discrimination can occur in one or the other form. The co-occurrence of five components of stigma includes labelling, stereotyping, separation, status loss, and discrimination”. Literature identifies different types of mental health-related stigma, including self-stigma, public stigma, professional stigma, and institutional stigma. Stigma in mental illness is a serious social problem that has a multitude of consequences on the individual concerned and his or her family. This paper throws light on the extent, problems associated, consequence and strategies to overcome stigma and burden among family caregivers so that the family members consider mental illness as disease which requires treatment.
Early conditions of lunatics started with the myths of treatment of Greek physicians. The use of massage, food, specialized bath has been mentioned in earlier written records. The conditions of lunatics remained to be pathetic with chains. The churches gave a possession by spirit aspect to the insane. Barely hospitals existed for admission of lunatic and those which existed believed in chaining. By the time reform started for care of insane de-chaining was the first welcome move. The need for female care takers came up for those admitted insane. Better results were felt worth appointing trainees female caretakers for insane. Prominent physicians advocated training for female caretakers with a psychiatric aspect. Courses were designed and upgraded for psychiatric nursing and inclusion of public domain in that. The path was ever evolving with a lot more to added from the eighteenth century.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.