International academic and professional healthcare fraternities share a common vision of interprofessional collaboration among the medicine, nursing and social sciences, and rehabilitation and paramedical professions. [1] Interprofessional collaboration among healthcare practitioners stems from interprofessional education. [1-3] Reeves et al. [1] state that interprofessional education occurs when medical, rehabilitative, nursing and social science professions study interactively for the primary purposes of improving interprofessional collaboration and enhancing the health and wellbeing of patients. Interprofessional education, research and collaboration among academics and practitioners break down the barriers of professional individualism, antagonism and competition, allowing a more holistic and multivalent approach to patient care ˗ thereby responding to the needs of the patient in a more dynamic manner. [1] Global advocacy for the adoption of interprofessional collaboration is based on the following validated claims: (i) respect for each other's profession; (ii) enhanced patient management; (iii) optimal use of each healthcare team member's skills; and (iv) provision of better healthcare to patients. [1] Interprofessional collaboration has been shown to enhance patient wellbeing and reduce the medical expense of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) and orthopaedic injuries. [3] Unfortunately, not all medical, rehabilitative, nursing and social science practitioners support interprofessional collaboration. [4-6] The opposite of interprofessional collaboration is professional individualism, which leads to antagonism and competition, with both national and international concerns being frequently brought to the surface regarding an individual discipline's scope of profession (SoP) and the issue of SoP trespassing among various medical, social science and rehabilitation practitioners, thereby inhibiting the progress of interprofessional healthcare collaboration. [1] South Africa (SA) has a long history of professional individualism and opposition to interprofessional collaboration among healthcare practitioners. [4-6] Naidoo and Buhler, [4] as well as Keyter, [5] reported that the alleged trespassing of the chiropractic profession on the SoP of physiotherapy and occupational therapy resulted in chiropractic therapy's deregistration from the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA). Recently, allegations regarding the profession of biokinetics, accused of trespassing onto the SoP of physiotherapy, have adversely affected the former. [6] Professional individualism and separation have an adverse effect on the quality of available healthcare. [3] The lack of interprofessional knowledge regarding healthcare leads to incorrect perceptions and professional individualism, which result in a dearth of patient referrals to applicable healthcare practitioners. [4,5] However, there is still hope that the SA healthcare fraternity will adopt the concept of interprofessional collaboration. Felsher and Ross [7] Background. Int...