2004
DOI: 10.1109/mis.2004.1265889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge representation with ontologies: the present and future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Knowledge has been represented using network, graphs, and finite automata and using concept maps. According to Christopher Brewster (2004) many knowledge based representations involve use of Ontology. Ontology finds its origin from the field of philosophy whereas its implication in the field of computer science is stated as "ontology is formal, explicit specification of a shared conceptualization" (Thomas R. Gruber, 1993).…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge has been represented using network, graphs, and finite automata and using concept maps. According to Christopher Brewster (2004) many knowledge based representations involve use of Ontology. Ontology finds its origin from the field of philosophy whereas its implication in the field of computer science is stated as "ontology is formal, explicit specification of a shared conceptualization" (Thomas R. Gruber, 1993).…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive description of KR can be found in [1]; a discussion of relationships between KR and Ontologies, in [2]. The major paradigms in KR are as follows.…”
Section: Overview Of Knowledge Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several paradigms have been used for KR, such as semantic networks, frames, production rules, and predicate logic [1,2]. In particular, Conceptual Graphs (CG) [3] have been used for KR because of its logic formalism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ontologies are a key component of the semantic web. Although rich ontologies support data exchange or reasoning [8], query expansion and complex visualization, we are interested in a pragmatic interpretation of website structure or classification schemes as ontologies [9] to support simple visualization .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. The proxy cross-references the results with the site ontology (7) and the results with their associated categories (8) are stored (9). 5.…”
Section: Fig 1 a Logical View Of The Naviguidance Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%