2021
DOI: 10.1108/9781789739190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge Risk and its Mitigation: Practices and Cases

Abstract: No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without either the prior written permission of the publisher or a licence permitting restricted copying issued in the UK by The Copyright Licensing Agency and in the USA by The Copyright Clearance Center. Any opinions expressed in the chapters are those of the authors. Whilst Emerald makes every effort to ensure the quality and accuracy of it… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, a grey-based DEMATEL technique is a combined methodology that enhances judgmental decisions using cause-effect diagraphs (Rajesh and Ravi, 2017). As Lee et al (2021) suggest that most risk evaluation is governed by judgmental opinion and choice, so it is appropriate to use a grey-based DEMATEL technique in this study. In addition, this technique helps resolve complex issues (Govindan et al, 2016;Khan et al, 2020;Seker et al, 2017) such as dealing with knowledge risks, which are typically dynamic (Bratianu, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, a grey-based DEMATEL technique is a combined methodology that enhances judgmental decisions using cause-effect diagraphs (Rajesh and Ravi, 2017). As Lee et al (2021) suggest that most risk evaluation is governed by judgmental opinion and choice, so it is appropriate to use a grey-based DEMATEL technique in this study. In addition, this technique helps resolve complex issues (Govindan et al, 2016;Khan et al, 2020;Seker et al, 2017) such as dealing with knowledge risks, which are typically dynamic (Bratianu, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, lack of technical knowledge and poor training and institutional actions are often significant. This highlights the need to develop awareness and commitment to the implementation of policies and guides at all levels of development planning (Lee et al, 2021;Cimellaro et al, 2010). Overall, there is a consistent pattern to research outcomes that point Disaster knowledge management to the inadequacy of holistic transition mechanisms that involve all stakeholder groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…All organizations can be exposed to one or more knowledge risks, both private [17,40] and public [41]. SMEs are at particular risk, as they may experience greater difficulties in managing knowledge risks due to their lower capital endowments [42].…”
Section: Knowledge Risks: the State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%