2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10869-019-09634-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge Sharing, Hypercompetitiveness, and Contextual Factors: Investigating a Three-Way Effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When it is impossible for HR managers to avoid assigning demanding workloads to their employees though, such as when hypercompetitive market environments make it necessary (Yoon, Kim and Go 2020), our results caution against making the problem worse by establishing an organisational decision-making climate that employees perceive as strongly competitive. In such climates, employees feel even more threatened by their excessive workloads, so to protect their sense of self-worth, they blame their employer for not respecting the sanctity of their private lives, which justifies territorial protection of their knowledge resources.…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…When it is impossible for HR managers to avoid assigning demanding workloads to their employees though, such as when hypercompetitive market environments make it necessary (Yoon, Kim and Go 2020), our results caution against making the problem worse by establishing an organisational decision-making climate that employees perceive as strongly competitive. In such climates, employees feel even more threatened by their excessive workloads, so to protect their sense of self-worth, they blame their employer for not respecting the sanctity of their private lives, which justifies territorial protection of their knowledge resources.…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Our findings of a catalytic role of perceived organizational unforgiveness should not be interpreted as a suggestion that organizational leaders should simply forgive employees for every mistake they make. Individual errors can have terribly detrimental consequences, especially in hypercompetitive market environments (Yoon et al , 2020). But it is the responsibility of organizational authorities to avoid appearing merciless in their evaluations, and thus avoid providing politically inept employees with an excuse to slack in their productive work efforts (Guchait et al , 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical evidence suggests that hypercompetitive individuals do, in fact, engage in primary control actions. For example, hypercompetitive individuals have been shown to engage in ethically questionable behavior such as withholding knowledge from coworkers (Yoon et al, 2020), engaging in unethical bargaining behavior (Westbrook et al, 2011), and cheating in academic contexts (Orosz et al, 2013). Such instrumental behavior is presumably, at least in part, the result of an ego-driven need to outperform perceived competitors.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%