2014
DOI: 10.15439/2014f280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge Sharing in Distributed Agile Projects: Techniques, Strategies and Challenges

Abstract: Abstract-Knowledge management (KM) is essential for success in global software development. Software organizations are now managing knowledge in innovative ways to increase productivity. In agile software development, collaboration and coordination depend on the communication, which is the key to success. To maintain effective collaboration and coordination in distributed agile projects, practitioners need to adopt different types of knowledge sharing techniques and strategies. There are also few studies that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The non-confirmation of the H2 hypothesis diverges from the results reported by authors that consider practices for project management, such as daily meetings and retrospectives, as efficient mechanisms for the process of Organizational Learning [32]. Schwaber and Beedle [31] state that knowledge sharing takes place by four Agile practices of project management (sprint planning, daily meeting, sprint reviews and retrospectives).…”
Section: Analysis Of Hypothesiscontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…The non-confirmation of the H2 hypothesis diverges from the results reported by authors that consider practices for project management, such as daily meetings and retrospectives, as efficient mechanisms for the process of Organizational Learning [32]. Schwaber and Beedle [31] state that knowledge sharing takes place by four Agile practices of project management (sprint planning, daily meeting, sprint reviews and retrospectives).…”
Section: Analysis Of Hypothesiscontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Technology helps in aiding the KS process. But in many studies it has been found that team members make little or no use of available technological tools and resources [19], [39], [43], [51], [52], [56]. In one survey it was found that 21% of the employees did not make use of available KS tools [52].…”
Section: B Technological Barriers 1) Lack and Improper Utilization Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Some communication barriers [50], [51] • Difference in communication behaviors [9], [10] • Different meanings of communicated messages [10] • Cultural differences often created misunderstanding and lead to frustration and conflict between regions, [2], [39] • Less effective cooperation [35] • Difficulties with knowledge sharing [40] • Difficulties with adapting coaching strategies effectively across cultural differences [43] Collaboration and controlling challenges, [50] • In culturally homogeneous development teams outside of North America, the inability to conform to specific views may lead to the disregard, inefficiency or failure of specific agile practices [53] Positive effects (opportunities)…”
Section: Problem (Main) Titlementioning
confidence: 99%