2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge sharing in smart grid pilot projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Better customer experience [29]. Knowledge sharing increased among them [30]. Changing needs of consumers supported [31].…”
Section: Added Value To Consumers Additional Values To Companiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Better customer experience [29]. Knowledge sharing increased among them [30]. Changing needs of consumers supported [31].…”
Section: Added Value To Consumers Additional Values To Companiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disposal of the waste harmful to society [69]. High revenue through vertical and horizontal integration [30].…”
Section: Dimension Advantages Disadvantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of smart grids (SG), the case studies are two pilot projects implemented in the Netherlands, in which nearly 50 households in two neighbourhoods are interconnected with specific smart grid approaches. Such pilot projects are currently the dominant form of smart grid implementation for residential households (Evers and Chappin 2020;Grimm, Kretschmer, and Mehl 2020). Data on the aims, technological set-up, and actors involved in these pilot projects was collected using semi-structured interviews and a document analysis in the context of the study in Milchram et al (2020).…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Brazil as in Africa, the current electrical system requires a change for new perspectives. Gerwin Evers and Maryse M. H. Chappin show the level of knowledge sharing on intelligent electrical networks and presents four levels of classification of this knowledge: intra-organizational, intra-project, interproject and project-external knowledge sharing [17]. M. Ourahou and al.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%