2020
DOI: 10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no7.555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge Sharing Influence on Innovation: A Case of Textile and Garment Enterprises in Vietnam

Abstract: The study seeks to investigate the relationship between knowledge sharing and innovation in garment and textile enterprises. While previous research has found many factors influencing knowledge sharing, little research has been done about the influence of knowledge sharing on innovation in enterprises in developing countries like Vietnam. In particular, the textile industry plays an important role in export, but outsourcing is accounting for a high proportion of trade; it is necessary to increase innovation in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, our keywords analysis showed that scholars used SEM models for various research problems among which the most frequent keywords included issues of sustainability (Balcerzak & Pietrzak, 2017;Agyabeng-Mensah et al, 2020;Srikalimah et al, 2020;Zaid et al, 2018); supply chain management (Tu, 2018;Zaid et al, 2018), innovation and knowledge management (Hoa et al, 2020;Khan et al, 2019;Mahmood et al, 2019;Mardi et al, 2018;Srikalimah et al, 2020); leadership (Bharadwaj & Deka, 2021;Fauzi et al, 2021;Haque et al, 2020;Mahmood et al, 2019), and organizational behavior (Khalid et al, 2021;Loan et al, 2021;Rani et al, 2018;Uddin et al, 2019). This trend of variety was also observed by other researchers (e.g., Hirschmann & Swoboda, 2017;Staniec, 2018;Zhang, Dawson, & Kline, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Third, our keywords analysis showed that scholars used SEM models for various research problems among which the most frequent keywords included issues of sustainability (Balcerzak & Pietrzak, 2017;Agyabeng-Mensah et al, 2020;Srikalimah et al, 2020;Zaid et al, 2018); supply chain management (Tu, 2018;Zaid et al, 2018), innovation and knowledge management (Hoa et al, 2020;Khan et al, 2019;Mahmood et al, 2019;Mardi et al, 2018;Srikalimah et al, 2020); leadership (Bharadwaj & Deka, 2021;Fauzi et al, 2021;Haque et al, 2020;Mahmood et al, 2019), and organizational behavior (Khalid et al, 2021;Loan et al, 2021;Rani et al, 2018;Uddin et al, 2019). This trend of variety was also observed by other researchers (e.g., Hirschmann & Swoboda, 2017;Staniec, 2018;Zhang, Dawson, & Kline, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The establishment of relational capital can enhance the trust, friendship and mutual respect among the member enterprises, and provide a good atmosphere for realizing their cooperation and sustainable development of supply chain [37]. Relational capital is conducive to communication effectively between enterprises in the supply chain, and communication, trust, and commitment can promote explicit and tacit knowledge sharing [62]. Thus, relational capital can improve explicit and tacit knowledge sharing between enterprises in the supply chain.…”
Section: Effect Of Relational Capital On Explicit and Tacit Knowledge Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge is divided into explicit and tacit knowledge, and the distinction between them is transmission mode [18]. Explicit knowledge is easily shared and transmitted in many ways [62], and collaboration is an important way [59]. Tacit knowledge sharing relies on trust and commitment between enterprises and most of these knowledge are transmitted via communication and cooperation [42].…”
Section: Relational Capital and Knowledge Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the knowledge level, the stakeholders in the OSC process form an extensive knowledge system, and the stable relationship quality can better facilitate knowledge sharing. Hoa et al (2020) stated that communication, trust, commitment, etc., facilitate knowledge sharing. A constructive communication atmosphere positively impacts on knowledge output and absorption (Hall, 2001;Hendriks, 1999).…”
Section: Stakeholders Relationship Quality and Knowledge Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%